The best indicator for Total Bond (BND)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Total Bond (BND) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Total Bond (BND) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Supertrend (14,4)
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Total Bond (BND) over ~19.1 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 0.5% CAGR.
Total Bond (BND) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Total Bond (BND) — trailing buy-and-hold by 0.7% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Supertrend (14,4) ✓ | Daily | 2.5% | 0.73 | -6.7% | 53.5% | 43 | -0.5% |
| 2 | Premier Stochastic ✓ | Weekly | 2.7% | 0.65 | -9.3% | 63.0% | 27 | -0.3% |
| 3 | Trend Regularity Adaptive MA ✓ | Weekly | 2.1% | 0.64 | -6.2% | 41.7% | 24 | -0.9% |
| 4 | SMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 2.3% | 0.64 | -6.4% | 53.3% | 15 | -0.7% |
| 5 | Coral Trend ✓ | Weekly | 2.7% | 0.63 | -10.5% | 68.4% | 19 | -0.3% |
| 6 | EMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Daily | 2.5% | 0.62 | -8.9% | 55.2% | 29 | -0.6% |
| 7 | McGinley 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 2.6% | 0.62 | -8.9% | 25.0% | 32 | -0.4% |
| 8 | Ehlers Stochastic ✓ | Weekly | 2.6% | 0.62 | -10.3% | 52.9% | 17 | -0.4% |
| 9 | Disparity (100) ✓ | Weekly | 2.4% | 0.66 | -6.4% | 50.0% | 14 | -0.6% |
| 10 | Vortex ✓ | Weekly | 2.4% | 0.61 | -10.3% | 52.9% | 34 | -0.6% |
| 11 | Inverse Fisher RSI | Weekly | 2.6% | 0.61 | -9.4% | 57.7% | 26 | -0.4% |
| 12 | SMA 5/20 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 2.5% | 0.61 | -10.4% | 52.6% | 19 | -0.5% |
| 13 | McGinley 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 2.6% | 0.61 | -10.0% | 47.4% | 19 | -0.4% |
| 14 | TRIMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 2.1% | 0.61 | -6.7% | 60.0% | 15 | -0.9% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Total Bond (BND) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 578 of 578 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Total Bond (BND), Supertrend (14,4) on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More etf
Get alerted when Total Bond’s signal flips
We track Total Bond daily. Its backtested best indicator, Supertrend (14,4) (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.