The best indicator for XDC Network (XDC)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real XDC Network (XDC) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where XDC Network (XDC) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
TEMA 20/50 Cross
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for XDC Network (XDC) over ~11.8 years — beating buy-and-hold by 48.1% CAGR.
XDC Network (XDC) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for XDC Network (XDC) — beating buy-and-hold by 42.7% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Daily | 69.4% | 1.01 | -83.7% | 52.8% | 53 | 48.1% |
| 2 | Even Better Sinewave ✓ | Daily | 76.6% | 0.99 | -76.1% | 45.1% | 51 | 55.3% |
| 3 | Keltner 20 Break ✓ | Daily | 51.6% | 0.96 | -50.0% | 44.8% | 58 | 30.2% |
| 4 | Acceleration Bands ✓ | Daily | 51.1% | 0.93 | -54.1% | 36.6% | 82 | 29.8% |
| 5 | Fisher Center-of-Gravity ✓ | Weekly | 84.3% | 0.92 | -84.0% | 59.5% | 42 | 54.7% |
| 6 | Markov Regime ✓ | Weekly | 83.9% | 0.92 | -88.1% | 50.0% | 16 | 54.3% |
| 7 | SMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 55.1% | 0.91 | -80.3% | 45.7% | 46 | 33.8% |
| 8 | Range Filter ✓ | Daily | 56.2% | 0.91 | -52.5% | 47.8% | 138 | 34.9% |
| 9 | Stochastic Fast (5,3) ✓ | Weekly | 78.6% | 0.91 | -88.7% | 44.4% | 54 | 49.0% |
| 10 | Ichimoku TK Cross ✓ | Daily | 54.0% | 0.9 | -79.7% | 53.3% | 60 | 32.7% |
| 11 | Linear Regression Slope ✓ | Daily | 54.1% | 0.9 | -87.1% | 42.7% | 75 | 32.8% |
| 12 | HalfTrend ✓ | Daily | 61.7% | 0.9 | -92.3% | 37.1% | 62 | 40.4% |
| 13 | Volume Flow Indicator ✓ | Daily | 54.7% | 0.9 | -66.0% | 41.2% | 17 | 33.4% |
| 14 | Correlation Trend ✓ | Daily | 54.1% | 0.9 | -87.1% | 42.7% | 75 | 32.8% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on XDC Network (XDC) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 369 of 369 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For XDC Network (XDC), TEMA 20/50 Cross on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when XDC Network’s signal flips
We track XDC Network daily. Its backtested best indicator, TEMA 20/50 Cross (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.