The best indicator for A7A5 (A7A5)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real A7A5 (A7A5) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where A7A5 (A7A5) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Fibonacci Pivots
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for A7A5 (A7A5) over ~2.0 years — beating buy-and-hold by 49.4% CAGR.
A7A5 (A7A5) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for A7A5 (A7A5) — trailing buy-and-hold by 8.2% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Daily | 46.6% | 1.42 | -8.7% | 33.9% | 59 | 49.4% |
| 2 | Pivot Points (Standard) | Daily | 40.4% | 1.28 | -8.6% | 32.7% | 52 | 43.2% |
| 3 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Daily | 42.8% | 1.23 | -20.0% | 33.3% | 96 | 45.5% |
| 4 | Lorentzian Classification ✓ | Daily | 44.1% | 1.23 | -19.6% | 33.3% | 69 | 46.9% |
| 5 | VWAP Bands ✓ | Daily | 30.8% | 0.97 | -17.4% | 46.2% | 13 | 33.5% |
| 6 | Bollinger Mean-Reversion ✓ | Daily | 29.4% | 0.94 | -17.4% | 46.2% | 13 | 32.2% |
| 7 | Fibonacci Bands ✓ | Daily | 29.4% | 0.94 | -17.4% | 46.2% | 13 | 32.2% |
| 8 | Gator Oscillator | Daily | 6.0% | 0.81 | -3.4% | 54.1% | 37 | 8.7% |
| 9 | MA Envelope ✓ | Daily | 32.6% | 1.01 | -17.3% | 58.3% | 12 | 35.3% |
| 10 | Connors RSI-2 ✓ | Daily | 23.2% | 0.79 | -18.7% | 40.9% | 22 | 25.9% |
| 11 | Connors RSI ✓ | Daily | 18.5% | 0.68 | -18.7% | 52.4% | 21 | 21.2% |
| 12 | Projection Bands ✓ | Daily | 19.8% | 0.72 | -17.9% | 33.3% | 12 | 22.5% |
| 13 | Stochastic RSI ✓ | Daily | 7.6% | 0.53 | -9.4% | 53.3% | 15 | 10.3% |
| 14 | Laguerre RSI ✓ | Daily | 6.1% | 0.44 | -11.7% | 56.2% | 16 | 8.9% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on A7A5 (A7A5)
9 of 135 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on A7A5 (A7A5) outright. Another 1 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 0 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detrended Price Osc. | 1 | none needed | 8.85× |
| Ehlers Relative Vigor | 1 | none needed | 10.53× |
| Fisher Center-of-Gravity | 1 | none needed | 8.13× |
| Pivot Points (Standard) | 1 | none needed | 15.38× |
| Camarilla Pivots | 1 | none needed | 12.2× |
| Fibonacci Pivots | 1 | none needed | 15.38× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For A7A5 (A7A5), Fibonacci Pivots on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when A7A5’s signal flips
We track A7A5 daily. Its backtested best indicator, Fibonacci Pivots (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.