The best indicator for Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Ehlers Relative Vigor
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) over ~7.3 years — beating buy-and-hold by 150.3% CAGR.
Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) — beating buy-and-hold by 49.2% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ehlers Relative Vigor ✓ | Weekly | 143.3% | 1.34 | -69.1% | 50.0% | 28 | 150.3% |
| 2 | Relative Vigor Index | Weekly | 149.4% | 1.33 | -67.6% | 71.4% | 21 | 156.5% |
| 3 | SMA 30 Trend ✓ | Daily | 96.0% | 1.27 | -62.7% | 41.0% | 83 | 101.9% |
| 4 | Hull MA 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 92.2% | 1.26 | -64.8% | 38.9% | 54 | 98.2% |
| 5 | B-Xtrender | Weekly | 131.8% | 1.26 | -72.8% | 36.0% | 25 | 138.9% |
| 6 | LSMA 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 91.5% | 1.24 | -64.7% | 41.2% | 68 | 97.4% |
| 7 | Least Squares MA ✓ | Weekly | 128.2% | 1.23 | -77.0% | 60.0% | 15 | 135.2% |
| 8 | Stochastic Slow (21,5) ✓ | Weekly | 120.2% | 1.2 | -69.3% | 50.0% | 20 | 127.3% |
| 9 | Stochastic (20,5) | Weekly | 117.6% | 1.19 | -70.4% | 47.4% | 19 | 124.6% |
| 10 | Elder Impulse | Weekly | 103.7% | 1.18 | -72.7% | 42.9% | 28 | 110.8% |
| 11 | HMA 9/21 Cross | Weekly | 111.0% | 1.16 | -77.1% | 57.9% | 19 | 118.1% |
| 12 | DEMA 20/50 Cross | Daily | 86.0% | 1.15 | -73.1% | 35.7% | 28 | 92.0% |
| 13 | ROC (30) | Daily | 80.4% | 1.13 | -72.2% | 38.9% | 95 | 86.4% |
| 14 | CMO (30) | Daily | 80.4% | 1.13 | -72.2% | 38.9% | 95 | 86.4% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 420 of 420 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET), Ehlers Relative Vigor on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when Artificial Superintelligence Alliance’s signal flips
We track Artificial Superintelligence Alliance daily. Its backtested best indicator, Ehlers Relative Vigor (Weekly), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.