The best indicator for Render (RENDER)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Render (RENDER) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Render (RENDER) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Stochastic Fast (5,3)
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Render (RENDER) over ~6.3 years — beating buy-and-hold by 134.7% CAGR.
Render (RENDER) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Render (RENDER) — beating buy-and-hold by 17.2% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stochastic Fast (5,3) ✓ | Weekly | 212.5% | 1.32 | -72.0% | 56.1% | 41 | 134.7% |
| 2 | Volume Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 97.4% | 1.22 | -76.9% | 50.7% | 67 | 50.2% |
| 3 | Ehlers Roofing Filter ✓ | Daily | 114.3% | 1.22 | -85.7% | 50.0% | 36 | 67.1% |
| 4 | Hull MA 100 Trend | Daily | 95.6% | 1.2 | -71.6% | 48.8% | 41 | 48.4% |
| 5 | Andean Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 94.7% | 1.18 | -73.8% | 44.4% | 36 | 47.5% |
| 6 | SMA 30 Trend ✓ | Daily | 96.7% | 1.18 | -67.3% | 47.4% | 76 | 49.5% |
| 7 | Chande Forecast Osc. ✓ | Weekly | 159.3% | 1.18 | -75.6% | 55.6% | 27 | 81.6% |
| 8 | Stochastic (10,3) ✓ | Weekly | 159.9% | 1.18 | -70.2% | 41.2% | 34 | 82.2% |
| 9 | DEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Daily | 97.1% | 1.17 | -83.5% | 45.5% | 33 | 49.9% |
| 10 | WMA 30 Trend ✓ | Daily | 93.7% | 1.17 | -72.4% | 39.1% | 92 | 46.5% |
| 11 | Coppock Curve | Daily | 96.3% | 1.16 | -73.7% | 34.7% | 49 | 49.1% |
| 12 | Instantaneous Trendline ✓ | Daily | 95.9% | 1.16 | -83.8% | 39.5% | 81 | 48.7% |
| 13 | CMO (21) | Daily | 96.4% | 1.16 | -83.5% | 38.0% | 92 | 49.2% |
| 14 | Cutler's RSI ✓ | Daily | 93.8% | 1.15 | -72.3% | 38.8% | 121 | 46.5% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Render (RENDER) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 379 of 379 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Render (RENDER), Stochastic Fast (5,3) on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when Render’s signal flips
We track Render daily. Its backtested best indicator, Stochastic Fast (5,3) (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.