The best indicator for Home Construction (ITB)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Home Construction (ITB) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Home Construction (ITB) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
SSL Channel
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Home Construction (ITB) over ~20.2 years — beating buy-and-hold by 6.5% CAGR.
Home Construction (ITB) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Home Construction (ITB) — beating buy-and-hold by 3.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SSL Channel ✓ | Weekly | 10.3% | 0.56 | -38.2% | 66.7% | 33 | 6.5% |
| 2 | Volatility Stop (ATR) ✓ | Weekly | 9.5% | 0.53 | -58.5% | 59.1% | 22 | 5.6% |
| 3 | QQE ✓ | Weekly | 12.8% | 0.52 | -51.9% | 42.1% | 57 | 9.0% |
| 4 | TEMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 6.9% | 0.52 | -36.3% | 44.4% | 36 | 3.0% |
| 5 | TEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.3% | 0.51 | -36.7% | 55.0% | 20 | 4.4% |
| 6 | PMax ✓ | Daily | 9.4% | 0.51 | -51.9% | 55.6% | 27 | 5.5% |
| 7 | McGinley 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 9.2% | 0.49 | -45.2% | 42.9% | 35 | 5.3% |
| 8 | FRAMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 7.9% | 0.49 | -36.6% | 35.6% | 73 | 4.1% |
| 9 | TRIX (21) ✓ | Daily | 8.6% | 0.48 | -46.2% | 54.3% | 35 | 4.7% |
| 10 | SMA 15/60 Cross ✓ | Daily | 8.3% | 0.47 | -42.8% | 51.2% | 43 | 4.4% |
| 11 | VIDYA ✓ | Weekly | 7.3% | 0.47 | -38.1% | 48.4% | 31 | 3.4% |
| 12 | Markov Regime ✓ | Daily | 7.5% | 0.47 | -45.9% | 41.9% | 124 | 3.6% |
| 13 | DeMarker (21) ✓ | Weekly | 7.3% | 0.46 | -54.5% | 42.4% | 33 | 3.4% |
| 14 | FRAMA 200 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 6.7% | 0.46 | -33.3% | 39.3% | 84 | 2.9% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Home Construction (ITB)
9 of 592 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Home Construction (ITB) outright. Another 299 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 154 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| QQE | 1 | 1.02× | 2.93× |
| Connors RSI | 1 | 1.09× | 6.78× |
| Markov Regime | 1 | 1.75× | 2.32× |
| VIDYA 30 Trend | 1 | 2.07× | 3.08× |
| DMI Direction | 1 | 2.23× | 3.53× |
| SSL Channel | 1 | none needed | 3.43× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Home Construction (ITB), SSL Channel on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More etf
Get alerted when Home Construction’s signal flips
We track Home Construction daily. Its backtested best indicator, SSL Channel (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.