The best indicator for Humanity (H)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Humanity (H) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Humanity (H) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
QQE
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Humanity (H) over ~1.4 years — beating buy-and-hold by 1095.4% CAGR.
Humanity (H) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Humanity (H) — beating buy-and-hold by 2015.2% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | QQE ✓ | Daily | 1896.9% | 2.06 | -77.4% | 50.0% | 18 | 1095.4% |
| 2 | Pretty Good Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 1421.0% | 1.97 | -50.8% | 68.8% | 16 | 619.4% |
| 3 | Accelerator Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 984.7% | 1.95 | -68.4% | 47.1% | 17 | 183.1% |
| 4 | Deviation-Scaled MA ✓ | Daily | 1283.7% | 1.94 | -67.1% | 66.7% | 30 | 482.1% |
| 5 | Ehlers SuperSmoother ✓ | Daily | 1271.5% | 1.89 | -74.2% | 58.7% | 46 | 470.0% |
| 6 | Hull MA Trend ✓ | Daily | 1125.8% | 1.88 | -52.4% | 61.1% | 18 | 324.3% |
| 7 | Vortex (7) ✓ | Daily | 1068.1% | 1.86 | -65.7% | 52.0% | 25 | 266.6% |
| 8 | Stochastic Slow (21,5) ✓ | Daily | 1050.4% | 1.85 | -55.4% | 42.9% | 21 | 248.8% |
| 9 | Stochastic (20,5) ✓ | Daily | 1059.1% | 1.85 | -57.1% | 40.9% | 22 | 257.6% |
| 10 | Vortex ✓ | Daily | 1434.7% | 1.97 | -71.6% | 64.3% | 14 | 633.1% |
| 11 | Random Walk Index ✓ | Daily | 1434.7% | 1.97 | -71.6% | 64.3% | 14 | 633.1% |
| 12 | Random Walk Index ✓ | Daily | 1434.7% | 1.97 | -71.6% | 64.3% | 14 | 633.1% |
| 13 | Smoothed Heikin-Ashi ✓ | Daily | 960.5% | 1.83 | -67.3% | 56.2% | 16 | 158.9% |
| 14 | Ehlers Cyber Cycle ✓ | Daily | 726.8% | 1.83 | -59.3% | 53.1% | 32 | -74.8% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Humanity (H)
0 of 43 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Humanity (H) outright. Another 9 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 34 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detrended Price Osc. | — | 1.02× | 2.49× |
| Williams %R (7) | — | 1.45× | 2.82× |
| MBFX Timing | — | 1.45× | 2.82× |
| Heikin-Ashi Trend | — | 1.48× | 3.64× |
| Rainbow MA | — | 1.78× | 2.33× |
| Ehlers SuperSmoother | — | 2.53× | 3.02× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Humanity (H), QQE on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when Humanity’s signal flips
We track Humanity daily. Its backtested best indicator, QQE (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.