The best indicator for Cosmos Hub (ATOM)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Cosmos Hub (ATOM) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Cosmos Hub (ATOM) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Ehlers Relative Vigor
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Cosmos Hub (ATOM) over ~7.6 years — beating buy-and-hold by 46.8% CAGR.
Cosmos Hub (ATOM) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Cosmos Hub (ATOM) — beating buy-and-hold by 52.3% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Center of Gravity | Weekly | 37.6% | 0.78 | -71.8% | 42.2% | 45 | 50.1% |
| 2 | Gator Oscillator | Daily | 23.1% | 0.77 | -46.8% | 53.0% | 134 | 34.5% |
| 3 | Ehlers Relative Vigor ✓ | Weekly | 34.4% | 0.74 | -63.7% | 38.7% | 31 | 46.8% |
| 4 | Stochastic Slow (21,5) | Weekly | 32.6% | 0.72 | -72.1% | 47.8% | 23 | 45.0% |
| 5 | Least Squares MA | Weekly | 32.1% | 0.71 | -76.1% | 42.9% | 28 | 44.5% |
| 6 | Derivative Oscillator | Weekly | 29.8% | 0.7 | -75.5% | 42.9% | 21 | 42.3% |
| 7 | Stoch RSI (fast) | Weekly | 30.5% | 0.7 | -74.5% | 47.4% | 38 | 42.9% |
| 8 | Stochastic (20,5) | Weekly | 30.5% | 0.7 | -72.5% | 47.8% | 23 | 43.0% |
| 9 | Fractal Adaptive MA | Weekly | 29.7% | 0.69 | -78.6% | 40.5% | 42 | 42.1% |
| 10 | HMA 9/21 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 23.3% | 0.64 | -68.5% | 52.2% | 23 | 35.7% |
| 11 | Woodie Pivots ✓ | Weekly | 23.7% | 0.63 | -61.8% | 37.3% | 75 | 36.1% |
| 12 | Vortex (7) ✓ | Weekly | 21.7% | 0.62 | -69.9% | 34.6% | 26 | 34.1% |
| 13 | Chande-Kroll Stop (fast) | Weekly | 18.4% | 0.61 | -81.7% | 33.3% | 30 | 30.8% |
| 14 | Relative Vigor Index ✓ | Weekly | 21.8% | 0.6 | -72.1% | 34.5% | 29 | 34.3% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Cosmos Hub (ATOM) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 373 of 373 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Cosmos Hub (ATOM), Ehlers Relative Vigor on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when Cosmos Hub’s signal flips
We track Cosmos Hub daily. Its backtested best indicator, Ehlers Relative Vigor (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.