The best indicator for Cosmos Hub (ATOM)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Cosmos Hub (ATOM) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Cosmos Hub (ATOM) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Elder-Ray
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Cosmos Hub (ATOM) over ~7.3 years — beating buy-and-hold by 45.0% CAGR.
Cosmos Hub (ATOM) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Cosmos Hub (ATOM) — beating buy-and-hold by 52.3% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elder-Ray ✓ | Weekly | 31.6% | 0.88 | -28.8% | 37.0% | 27 | 45.0% |
| 2 | Gator Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 25.2% | 0.81 | -43.1% | 52.3% | 130 | 37.4% |
| 3 | Least Squares MA | Weekly | 38.3% | 0.78 | -68.6% | 40.0% | 25 | 51.6% |
| 4 | Center of Gravity | Weekly | 35.1% | 0.75 | -71.8% | 40.9% | 44 | 48.5% |
| 5 | Fractal Adaptive MA | Weekly | 33.6% | 0.73 | -73.1% | 35.9% | 39 | 47.0% |
| 6 | Ehlers Relative Vigor ✓ | Weekly | 31.5% | 0.71 | -63.7% | 36.7% | 30 | 44.8% |
| 7 | Stochastic Slow (21,5) | Weekly | 30.2% | 0.69 | -72.5% | 45.5% | 22 | 43.6% |
| 8 | Stoch RSI (fast) | Weekly | 29.9% | 0.69 | -71.3% | 47.2% | 36 | 43.3% |
| 9 | Derivative Oscillator | Weekly | 28.2% | 0.67 | -75.5% | 40.0% | 20 | 41.6% |
| 10 | Stochastic (20,5) | Weekly | 28.2% | 0.67 | -73.0% | 45.5% | 22 | 41.5% |
| 11 | Woodie Pivots | Weekly | 24.7% | 0.65 | -61.8% | 36.1% | 72 | 38.1% |
| 12 | Vortex (7) | Weekly | 20.9% | 0.62 | -70.4% | 32.0% | 25 | 34.2% |
| 13 | Chande-Kroll Stop (fast) | Weekly | 17.4% | 0.61 | -79.4% | 28.6% | 28 | 30.7% |
| 14 | Inverse Fisher RSI | Daily | 20.1% | 0.6 | -72.2% | 38.4% | 86 | 32.2% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Cosmos Hub (ATOM) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 373 of 373 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Cosmos Hub (ATOM), Elder-Ray on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when Cosmos Hub’s signal flips
We track Cosmos Hub daily. Its backtested best indicator, Elder-Ray (Weekly), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.