The best indicator for Dividend Aristocrats
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Dividend Aristocrats history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Dividend Aristocrats stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Zero-Lag LSMA
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Dividend Aristocrats over ~12.8 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 2.3% CAGR.
Dividend Aristocrats on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zero-Lag LSMA ✓ | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.9 | -11.6% | 61.5% | 39 | -2.3% |
| 2 | Connors RSI-2 ✓ | Weekly | 6.1% | 0.7 | -23.6% | 83.3% | 30 | -4.3% |
| 3 | Adaptive Supertrend ✓ | Weekly | 7.3% | 0.68 | -17.4% | 66.7% | 18 | -3.1% |
| 4 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 7.7% | 0.67 | -16.1% | 43.3% | 30 | -2.9% |
| 5 | Twiggs Money Flow ✓ | Weekly | 7.8% | 0.67 | -13.8% | 55.2% | 29 | -2.6% |
| 6 | QQE ✓ | Weekly | 8.6% | 0.66 | -22.3% | 54.3% | 35 | -1.8% |
| 7 | Lorentzian Classification ✓ | Weekly | 8.3% | 0.65 | -31.1% | 64.8% | 71 | -2.1% |
| 8 | Stochastic (20,5) ✓ | Weekly | 5.7% | 0.64 | -13.2% | 52.2% | 46 | -4.7% |
| 9 | Laguerre RSI ✓ | Weekly | 3.4% | 0.63 | -10.6% | 70.6% | 17 | -7.0% |
| 10 | Predictive Ranges ✓ | Weekly | 7.2% | 0.63 | -23.5% | 68.4% | 19 | -3.2% |
| 11 | QQE ✓ | Daily | 8.5% | 0.61 | -33.7% | 43.9% | 180 | -2.0% |
| 12 | Accumulation/Distribution ✓ | Weekly | 6.9% | 0.61 | -16.1% | 54.8% | 31 | -3.5% |
| 13 | DEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Daily | 5.0% | 0.6 | -15.2% | 47.2% | 53 | -5.5% |
| 14 | DeMarker ✓ | Daily | 5.1% | 0.6 | -17.6% | 84.6% | 39 | -5.5% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Dividend Aristocrats
1 of 548 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Dividend Aristocrats outright. Another 233 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 89 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEMA 20/50 Cross | 1 | none needed | 9.35× |
| QQE | — | 1.31× | 7.35× |
| Detrended Price Osc. | — | 1.56× | 7.64× |
| Demand Index | — | 1.84× | 9.21× |
| Parabolic SAR (fast) | — | 1.96× | 8.31× |
| Chande-Kroll Stop (fast) | — | 1.99× | 8.27× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Dividend Aristocrats, Zero-Lag LSMA on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More etf
Get alerted when Dividend Aristocrats’s signal flips
We track Dividend Aristocrats daily. Its backtested best indicator, Zero-Lag LSMA (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.