The best indicator for Mantle (MNT)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Mantle (MNT) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Mantle (MNT) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
MA Envelope
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Mantle (MNT) over ~1.9 years — beating buy-and-hold by 1400407.4% CAGR.
Mantle (MNT) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Mantle (MNT) — beating buy-and-hold by 102.3% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MA Envelope ✓ | Daily | 1400313.2% | 2.2 | -76.1% | 48.9% | 47 | 1400407.4% |
| 2 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Daily | 466446.4% | 2.02 | -97.8% | 44.0% | 75 | 466540.6% |
| 3 | Connors RSI ✓ | Daily | 797.7% | 1.95 | -66.3% | 66.7% | 15 | 891.9% |
| 4 | Markov Regime ✓ | Daily | 3555.6% | 1.88 | -67.9% | 48.5% | 33 | 3649.9% |
| 5 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Daily | 72636.8% | 1.82 | -98.4% | 44.9% | 89 | 72731.1% |
| 6 | QQE ✓ | Daily | -12.6% | 1.75 | -95.1% | 55.0% | 20 | 81.7% |
| 7 | Pivot Points (Standard) ✓ | Daily | 58196.1% | 1.73 | -97.2% | 43.1% | 65 | 58290.4% |
| 8 | Detrended Price Osc. ✓ | Daily | 1678.7% | 1.66 | -82.9% | 46.7% | 60 | 1773.0% |
| 9 | Projection Bands ✓ | Daily | 1677.9% | 1.62 | -94.3% | 58.8% | 17 | 1772.2% |
| 10 | Zero-Lag EMA Cross ✓ | Daily | -47.0% | 1.56 | -99.4% | 55.0% | 20 | 47.3% |
| 11 | ZLEMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | -47.0% | 1.56 | -99.4% | 55.0% | 20 | 47.3% |
| 12 | Connors RSI-2 ✓ | Daily | 994.7% | 1.63 | -65.8% | 71.4% | 14 | 1089.0% |
| 13 | Markov Regime (Confirmed) ✓ | Daily | 1070.4% | 1.52 | -67.9% | 56.7% | 30 | 1164.7% |
| 14 | Ehlers Relative Vigor ✓ | Daily | -48.0% | 1.39 | -98.9% | 40.5% | 42 | 46.3% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Mantle (MNT)
4 of 56 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Mantle (MNT) outright. Another 1 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 0 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Detrended Price Osc. | 1 | none needed | 1.5× |
| Accelerator Oscillator | 1 | none needed | 2.65× |
| Ehlers Cyber Cycle | 1 | none needed | 3.03× |
| Camarilla Pivots | 1 | none needed | 1.94× |
| Donchian 20 Break | — | 4.45× | 35.71× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Mantle (MNT), MA Envelope on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when Mantle’s signal flips
We track Mantle daily. Its backtested best indicator, MA Envelope (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.