The best indicator for Wheat (ZW)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Wheat (ZW) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Wheat (ZW) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
VWAP Bands
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Wheat (ZW) over ~26.0 years — beating buy-and-hold by 4.0% CAGR.
Wheat (ZW) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Wheat (ZW) — beating buy-and-hold by 0.3% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VWAP Bands ✓ | Weekly | 7.4% | 0.57 | -28.6% | 70.4% | 27 | 4.0% |
| 2 | Bollinger Mean-Reversion ✓ | Daily | 7.1% | 0.56 | -24.4% | 67.0% | 103 | 3.7% |
| 3 | Fibonacci Bands ✓ | Daily | 7.1% | 0.56 | -24.4% | 67.0% | 103 | 3.7% |
| 4 | Detrended Price Osc. ✓ | Weekly | 10.2% | 0.56 | -41.4% | 53.5% | 155 | 6.8% |
| 5 | Connors RSI ✓ | Daily | 7.0% | 0.48 | -48.9% | 61.5% | 348 | 3.6% |
| 6 | Projection Bands ✓ | Weekly | 8.7% | 0.47 | -40.4% | 76.8% | 56 | 5.4% |
| 7 | VWAP Bands ✓ | Daily | 6.1% | 0.46 | -36.5% | 64.9% | 114 | 2.7% |
| 8 | Connors RSI-2 ✓ | Daily | 6.1% | 0.45 | -46.5% | 60.6% | 330 | 2.7% |
| 9 | Ultimate Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 8.4% | 0.45 | -56.6% | 67.8% | 59 | 5.0% |
| 10 | Fisher Center-of-Gravity ✓ | Weekly | 7.4% | 0.44 | -33.3% | 50.7% | 134 | 4.1% |
| 11 | Williams %R ✓ | Weekly | 7.4% | 0.43 | -48.9% | 63.6% | 44 | 4.1% |
| 12 | Murrey Math Lines ✓ | Daily | 6.5% | 0.41 | -47.0% | 74.1% | 85 | 3.1% |
| 13 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Weekly | 6.5% | 0.41 | -39.0% | 53.5% | 213 | 3.2% |
| 14 | Money Flow Index ✓ | Daily | 6.6% | 0.4 | -57.5% | 67.3% | 55 | 3.1% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Wheat (ZW)
78 of 666 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Wheat (ZW) outright. Another 19 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 20 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stochastic | 2 | none needed | 2.41× |
| Connors RSI-2 | 2 | none needed | 3.79× |
| MA Envelope | 2 | none needed | 2.95× |
| Historical Volatility Regime | 2 | none needed | 4.45× |
| Zero-Lag MACD | 2 | none needed | 2.23× |
| Projection Bands | 2 | none needed | 3.21× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Wheat (ZW), VWAP Bands on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More commodity
Get alerted when Wheat’s signal flips
We track Wheat daily. Its backtested best indicator, VWAP Bands (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.