The best indicator for Pi Network (PI)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Pi Network (PI) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Pi Network (PI) stopped updating on 2025-04-10
Our price source has returned nothing for PI-USD in 520 days. That usually means the ticker was delisted or renamed — several assets on this page type have been, and the old symbol simply stops. We are not showing key levels, because the last close we hold (0.0021, 2025-04-10) is not a current price and should not be read as one.
The backtest results below are unaffected — they describe the history that does exist, and they are what this page is for.
Fisher Center-of-Gravity
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Pi Network (PI) over ~6.9 years — beating buy-and-hold by 129.4% CAGR.
Pi Network (PI) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Pi Network (PI) — beating buy-and-hold by 70.5% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fisher Center-of-Gravity ✓ | Weekly | 83.9% | 1.02 | -69.9% | 50.0% | 32 | 129.4% |
| 2 | Chande Forecast Osc. ✓ | Weekly | 65.6% | 0.93 | -78.1% | 50.0% | 30 | 111.1% |
| 3 | Stochastic (10,3) ✓ | Weekly | 56.7% | 0.9 | -75.3% | 47.2% | 36 | 102.2% |
| 4 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Daily | 57.1% | 0.88 | -91.2% | 45.5% | 503 | 93.2% |
| 5 | FRAMA 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 56.3% | 0.85 | -66.3% | 33.3% | 33 | 101.8% |
| 6 | Ehlers Roofing Filter ✓ | Daily | 47.6% | 0.83 | -76.4% | 43.2% | 37 | 83.7% |
| 7 | T3 10/40 Cross ✓ | Daily | 46.7% | 0.82 | -79.8% | 47.8% | 23 | 82.8% |
| 8 | Ehlers Cyber Cycle ✓ | Weekly | 35.4% | 0.79 | -85.3% | 38.7% | 31 | 81.0% |
| 9 | Ehlers SuperSmoother ✓ | Weekly | 40.4% | 0.78 | -76.4% | 36.7% | 49 | 85.9% |
| 10 | Zero-Lag LSMA ✓ | Weekly | 37.8% | 0.77 | -82.4% | 33.3% | 15 | 83.3% |
| 11 | Awesome Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 39.5% | 0.76 | -72.5% | 38.8% | 49 | 75.6% |
| 12 | Chaikin Money Flow ✓ | Daily | 33.3% | 0.75 | -69.9% | 47.4% | 78 | 69.4% |
| 13 | Least Squares MA ✓ | Weekly | 31.0% | 0.74 | -75.3% | 26.1% | 23 | 76.5% |
| 14 | KDJ ✓ | Weekly | 34.3% | 0.74 | -68.1% | 36.0% | 25 | 79.8% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Pi Network (PI) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 380 of 380 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Pi Network (PI), Fisher Center-of-Gravity on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when Pi Network’s signal flips
We track Pi Network daily. Its backtested best indicator, Fisher Center-of-Gravity (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.