The best indicator for Midnight (NIGHT)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Midnight (NIGHT) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Midnight (NIGHT) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Hull MA Trend
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Midnight (NIGHT) over ~2.8 years — beating buy-and-hold by 323.2% CAGR.
Midnight (NIGHT) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Midnight (NIGHT) — trailing buy-and-hold by 455.8% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hull MA Trend ✓ | Daily | 728.9% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 12.2% | 41 | 323.2% |
| 2 | T3 (Tillson) ✓ | Daily | 632.0% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 20.4% | 49 | 226.4% |
| 3 | Zero-Lag EMA Cross ✓ | Daily | 1256.3% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 22.6% | 31 | 850.7% |
| 4 | Accelerator Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 2105.6% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 28.6% | 42 | 1699.9% |
| 5 | Klinger Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 53851.5% | 0.76 | -85.2% | 28.6% | 21 | 53445.9% |
| 6 | Least Squares MA ✓ | Daily | 355.7% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 23.2% | 56 | -49.9% |
| 7 | DMI Direction ✓ | Daily | 1286.6% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 12.5% | 16 | 881.0% |
| 8 | Zero-Lag LSMA ✓ | Daily | 962.0% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 20.8% | 48 | 556.4% |
| 9 | QQE ✓ | Daily | 1329.8% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 10.3% | 39 | 924.2% |
| 10 | ZLEMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 1256.3% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 22.6% | 31 | 850.7% |
| 11 | HMA 9/21 Cross ✓ | Daily | 1296.9% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 19.6% | 46 | 891.3% |
| 12 | Bandpass Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 658.1% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 11.1% | 36 | 252.5% |
| 13 | DeMarker (21) ✓ | Daily | 1305.6% | 0.76 | -100.0% | 40.0% | 20 | 900.0% |
| 14 | Stoch RSI (fast) ✓ | Daily | 22899.8% | 0.76 | -97.0% | 27.0% | 63 | 22494.2% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Midnight (NIGHT)
19 of 128 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Midnight (NIGHT) outright. Another 3 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 5 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hull MA Trend | 1 | none needed | 1.0× |
| Detrended Price Osc. | 1 | none needed | 2.02× |
| T3 (Tillson) | 1 | none needed | 1.0× |
| Zero-Lag EMA Cross | 1 | none needed | 1.0× |
| Accelerator Oscillator | 1 | none needed | 1.0× |
| Klinger Oscillator | 1 | none needed | 1.58× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Midnight (NIGHT), Hull MA Trend on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when Midnight’s signal flips
We track Midnight daily. Its backtested best indicator, Hull MA Trend (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.