The best indicator for Zimmer Biomet (ZBH)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
DeMarker
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) over ~24.8 years — beating buy-and-hold by 3.4% CAGR.
Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) — beating buy-and-hold by 0.9% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeMarker ✓ | Daily | 8.5% | 0.58 | -39.1% | 71.7% | 92 | 3.4% |
| 2 | Connors RSI ✓ | Weekly | 6.2% | 0.44 | -45.9% | 64.2% | 67 | 0.9% |
| 3 | WaveTrend (8/6/4) ✓ | Daily | 6.6% | 0.42 | -55.7% | 72.2% | 97 | 1.6% |
| 4 | Intraday Momentum Index ✓ | Daily | 6.3% | 0.42 | -56.1% | 67.7% | 62 | 1.2% |
| 5 | Projection Bands ✓ | Daily | 6.1% | 0.42 | -56.2% | 70.8% | 219 | 1.0% |
| 6 | MA Envelope ✓ | Weekly | 6.5% | 0.42 | -52.1% | 70.0% | 60 | 1.2% |
| 7 | Markov Regime ✓ | Weekly | 6.6% | 0.39 | -57.3% | 51.0% | 96 | 1.4% |
| 8 | Stochastic RSI ✓ | Weekly | 4.7% | 0.38 | -37.5% | 67.6% | 37 | -0.5% |
| 9 | Supertrend (20,3) ✓ | Weekly | 5.1% | 0.36 | -44.8% | 37.5% | 16 | -0.1% |
| 10 | Stochastic Momentum Index ✓ | Daily | 4.6% | 0.35 | -50.2% | 78.4% | 102 | -0.4% |
| 11 | Supertrend (10,3) ✓ | Weekly | 4.8% | 0.35 | -47.6% | 37.5% | 16 | -0.4% |
| 12 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Weekly | 4.9% | 0.35 | -37.0% | 56.7% | 201 | -0.4% |
| 13 | CCI ✓ | Daily | 4.7% | 0.34 | -51.4% | 74.6% | 118 | -0.4% |
| 14 | Pivot Points (Standard) ✓ | Weekly | 4.6% | 0.34 | -37.7% | 59.3% | 182 | -0.7% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 650 of 650 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Zimmer Biomet (ZBH), DeMarker on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Zimmer Biomet’s signal flips
We track Zimmer Biomet daily. Its backtested best indicator, DeMarker (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.