The best indicator for Tyler Technologies (TYL)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Tyler Technologies (TYL) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Tyler Technologies (TYL) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Fibonacci Pivots
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Tyler Technologies (TYL) over ~46.2 years — beating buy-and-hold by 25.1% CAGR.
Tyler Technologies (TYL) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Tyler Technologies (TYL) — trailing buy-and-hold by 3.8% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Daily | 38.7% | 1.15 | -78.4% | 45.2% | 1906 | 25.1% |
| 2 | Pivot Points (Standard) ✓ | Daily | 35.3% | 1.1 | -76.9% | 45.3% | 1754 | 21.7% |
| 3 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Daily | 35.7% | 1.03 | -81.6% | 46.9% | 2326 | 22.1% |
| 4 | MA Envelope ✓ | Daily | 19.3% | 0.68 | -69.6% | 55.7% | 404 | 5.7% |
| 5 | Projection Bands ✓ | Daily | 16.7% | 0.64 | -69.3% | 56.0% | 411 | 3.1% |
| 6 | Connors RSI ✓ | Daily | 13.1% | 0.56 | -71.4% | 58.1% | 501 | -0.6% |
| 7 | Connors RSI-2 ✓ | Daily | 12.2% | 0.55 | -83.1% | 56.8% | 488 | -1.4% |
| 8 | Ulcer Index ✓ | Weekly | 10.7% | 0.53 | -76.8% | 58.0% | 50 | -3.1% |
| 9 | CCI Trend ✓ | Weekly | 11.9% | 0.52 | -76.5% | 34.8% | 89 | -1.9% |
| 10 | Donchian 10 Break ✓ | Weekly | 11.8% | 0.52 | -76.3% | 53.5% | 43 | -2.0% |
| 11 | Balance of Power ✓ | Weekly | 13.3% | 0.51 | -79.9% | 48.4% | 93 | -0.4% |
| 12 | SMA 20/80 Cross ✓ | Daily | 11.6% | 0.5 | -62.9% | 45.5% | 77 | -2.0% |
| 13 | TRIMA 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 9.9% | 0.5 | -84.8% | 44.1% | 59 | -3.8% |
| 14 | Demand Index ✓ | Daily | 11.5% | 0.49 | -62.6% | 60.1% | 461 | -2.1% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Tyler Technologies (TYL)
72 of 686 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Tyler Technologies (TYL) outright. Another 299 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 196 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sine-Weighted MA | 2 | none needed | 2.52× |
| Momentum (50) | 1 | 1.07× | 3.02× |
| SMA 100 Trend | 1 | 1.16× | 3.31× |
| RSI (50) | 1 | 1.17× | 2.56× |
| Relative Momentum Index | 1 | 1.18× | 3.09× |
| TRIMA 100 Trend | 1 | 1.2× | 2.73× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Tyler Technologies (TYL), Fibonacci Pivots on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Tyler Technologies’s signal flips
We track Tyler Technologies daily. Its backtested best indicator, Fibonacci Pivots (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.