The best indicator for SushiSwap
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real SushiSwap history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where SushiSwap stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Stochastic Fast (5,3)
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for SushiSwap over ~5.9 years — beating buy-and-hold by 110.9% CAGR.
SushiSwap on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stochastic Fast (5,3) ✓ | Weekly | 70.2% | 0.96 | -71.5% | 42.9% | 35 | 110.9% |
| 2 | SMA 10/40 Cross ✓ | Daily | 40.0% | 0.81 | -73.7% | 38.5% | 26 | 68.6% |
| 3 | Perfect Trend Line ✓ | Weekly | 43.1% | 0.79 | -77.2% | 35.7% | 28 | 83.8% |
| 4 | SMA 30 Trend ✓ | Daily | 36.2% | 0.78 | -75.7% | 31.2% | 64 | 64.9% |
| 5 | Ehlers SuperSmoother ✓ | Weekly | 35.6% | 0.73 | -85.5% | 40.0% | 40 | 76.3% |
| 6 | ROC (30) ✓ | Daily | 29.5% | 0.71 | -84.0% | 37.1% | 70 | 58.2% |
| 7 | CMO (30) ✓ | Daily | 29.5% | 0.71 | -84.0% | 37.1% | 70 | 58.2% |
| 8 | Momentum (30) ✓ | Daily | 29.5% | 0.71 | -84.0% | 37.1% | 70 | 58.2% |
| 9 | Rainbow MA ✓ | Weekly | 31.2% | 0.7 | -81.3% | 33.3% | 33 | 71.9% |
| 10 | WMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Daily | 26.6% | 0.68 | -83.1% | 32.0% | 25 | 55.3% |
| 11 | Balance of Power ✓ | Weekly | 30.5% | 0.68 | -75.0% | 42.1% | 19 | 71.2% |
| 12 | ROC (5) ✓ | Weekly | 26.5% | 0.67 | -92.8% | 28.0% | 25 | 67.2% |
| 13 | Vertical Horizontal Filter ✓ | Daily | 24.1% | 0.66 | -66.9% | 40.9% | 44 | 52.8% |
| 14 | Ehlers Roofing Filter ✓ | Daily | 20.9% | 0.66 | -94.5% | 35.7% | 28 | 49.6% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on SushiSwap lost money across the out-of-sample window in 337 of 337 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For SushiSwap, Stochastic Fast (5,3) on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when SushiSwap’s signal flips
We track SushiSwap daily. Its backtested best indicator, Stochastic Fast (5,3) (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.