The best indicator for Qnity Electronics (Q)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Qnity Electronics (Q) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Qnity Electronics (Q) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
FRAMA 10/30 Cross
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Qnity Electronics (Q) over ~0.6 years — beating buy-and-hold by 100.0% CAGR.
Qnity Electronics (Q) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Qnity Electronics (Q) — trailing buy-and-hold by 46.0% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRAMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 193.6% | 3.4 | -8.0% | 54.5% | 11 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Lorentzian Classification ✓ | Daily | 80.6% | 2.32 | -6.6% | 78.6% | 14 | -13.0% |
| 3 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Daily | 82.8% | 1.91 | -14.3% | 62.5% | 32 | -10.8% |
| 4 | Squeeze Momentum ✓ | Daily | 93.9% | 2.33 | -6.7% | 41.7% | 12 | 0.3% |
| 5 | B-Xtrender ✓ | Daily | 75.0% | 1.95 | -8.5% | 57.1% | 14 | -18.6% |
| 6 | Detrended Price Osc. ✓ | Daily | 64.0% | 1.67 | -13.0% | 60.0% | 20 | -29.6% |
| 7 | FRAMA 30 Trend ✓ | Daily | 71.7% | 1.59 | -15.5% | 46.7% | 15 | -21.9% |
| 8 | Fisher Center-of-Gravity ✓ | Daily | 54.4% | 1.54 | -8.7% | 60.0% | 15 | -39.2% |
| 9 | Perfect Trend Line ✓ | Daily | 57.2% | 1.31 | -14.7% | 59.1% | 22 | -36.4% |
| 10 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Daily | 44.9% | 1.3 | -20.2% | 68.0% | 25 | -48.6% |
| 11 | Arnaud Legoux MA ✓ | Daily | 75.9% | 1.55 | -14.9% | 41.7% | 12 | -17.7% |
| 12 | Elder Impulse ✓ | Daily | 42.9% | 1.23 | -13.3% | 44.4% | 18 | -50.7% |
| 13 | Gator Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 28.0% | 1.4 | -7.4% | 38.5% | 13 | -65.6% |
| 14 | Woodie Pivots ✓ | Daily | 45.7% | 1.16 | -11.8% | 50.0% | 34 | -47.9% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Qnity Electronics (Q)
0 of 3 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Qnity Electronics (Q) outright. Another 3 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 0 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodie Pivots | — | 1.17× | 12.05× |
| Accumulation Swing Index | — | 4.67× | 7.69× |
| Swing Index | — | 4.67× | 7.69× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Qnity Electronics (Q), FRAMA 10/30 Cross on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Qnity Electronics’s signal flips
We track Qnity Electronics daily. Its backtested best indicator, FRAMA 10/30 Cross (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.