The best indicator for Qnity Electronics (Q)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Qnity Electronics (Q) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Qnity Electronics (Q) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Fibonacci Pivots
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Qnity Electronics (Q) over ~0.9 years — beating buy-and-hold by 3.0% CAGR.
Qnity Electronics (Q) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Qnity Electronics (Q) — trailing buy-and-hold by 46.0% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRAMA 10/30 Cross | Daily | 82.4% | 1.93 | -25.2% | 62.5% | 16 | 47.1% |
| 2 | Camarilla Pivots | Daily | 55.8% | 1.45 | -14.3% | 58.0% | 50 | 20.5% |
| 3 | MA Envelope | Daily | 59.5% | 1.76 | -19.7% | 66.7% | 12 | 24.1% |
| 4 | Gann HiLo Activator | Daily | 57.0% | 1.32 | -22.0% | 62.5% | 16 | 21.7% |
| 5 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Daily | 38.4% | 1.17 | -20.2% | 61.5% | 39 | 3.0% |
| 6 | Markov Regime | Daily | 46.7% | 1.15 | -29.8% | 33.3% | 15 | 11.3% |
| 7 | Squeeze Momentum | Daily | 33.4% | 1.13 | -19.8% | 40.0% | 15 | -1.9% |
| 8 | Williams %R ✓ | Daily | 57.1% | 1.76 | -14.9% | 77.8% | 9 | 21.8% |
| 9 | Projection Bands ✓ | Daily | 61.0% | 1.71 | -15.9% | 77.8% | 9 | 25.6% |
| 10 | FRAMA 30 Trend | Daily | 36.9% | 1.02 | -15.5% | 52.4% | 21 | 1.6% |
| 11 | Fisher Center-of-Gravity | Daily | 27.9% | 0.97 | -14.5% | 50.0% | 24 | -7.4% |
| 12 | Demand Index ✓ | Daily | 40.7% | 1.32 | -15.9% | 63.6% | 11 | 5.3% |
| 13 | Disparity Index | Daily | 38.1% | 1.0 | -27.4% | 38.5% | 13 | 2.7% |
| 14 | Pretty Good Oscillator | Daily | 38.1% | 1.0 | -27.4% | 38.5% | 13 | 2.7% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Qnity Electronics (Q)
0 of 3 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Qnity Electronics (Q) outright. Another 3 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 0 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodie Pivots | — | 1.17× | 12.05× |
| Accumulation Swing Index | — | 4.67× | 7.69× |
| Swing Index | — | 4.67× | 7.69× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Qnity Electronics (Q), Fibonacci Pivots on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Qnity Electronics’s signal flips
We track Qnity Electronics daily. Its backtested best indicator, Fibonacci Pivots (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.