The best indicator for Jupiter (JUP)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Jupiter (JUP) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Jupiter (JUP) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Stochastic
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Jupiter (JUP) over ~12.2 years — beating buy-and-hold by 73.6% CAGR.
Jupiter (JUP) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Jupiter (JUP) — beating buy-and-hold by 18.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stochastic ✓ | Daily | 33.5% | 1.44 | -98.3% | 52.0% | 25 | 73.6% |
| 2 | Williams %R ✓ | Daily | 10.8% | 1.3 | -100.0% | 41.5% | 65 | 50.9% |
| 3 | Intraday Momentum Index ✓ | Daily | -10.9% | 1.06 | -99.3% | 45.7% | 35 | 29.2% |
| 4 | VWAP Bands ✓ | Daily | 2039.7% | 1.0 | -96.2% | 50.7% | 73 | 2079.8% |
| 5 | SMC: Liquidity Sweep ✓ | Daily | -26.0% | 0.98 | -100.0% | 58.3% | 36 | 14.2% |
| 6 | Supertrend (14,4) ✓ | Daily | -93.7% | 0.94 | -100.0% | 26.9% | 26 | -53.6% |
| 7 | Bollinger Mean-Reversion ✓ | Daily | 783.9% | 0.93 | -99.0% | 50.0% | 44 | 824.0% |
| 8 | Fibonacci Bands ✓ | Daily | 783.9% | 0.93 | -99.0% | 50.0% | 44 | 824.0% |
| 9 | Money Flow Index ✓ | Daily | -38.7% | 0.92 | -99.8% | 41.2% | 34 | 1.4% |
| 10 | Markov Regime | Daily | 79.0% | 0.91 | -93.3% | 43.9% | 57 | 119.1% |
| 11 | MA Envelope ✓ | Weekly | 127.6% | 0.9 | -98.4% | 42.3% | 26 | 177.2% |
| 12 | Projection Bands ✓ | Weekly | 137.9% | 0.89 | -97.6% | 56.2% | 16 | 187.6% |
| 13 | CCI ✓ | Daily | 20.0% | 0.86 | -100.0% | 40.4% | 52 | 60.1% |
| 14 | Markov Regime (Confirmed) | Daily | 91.1% | 0.86 | -89.0% | 47.1% | 34 | 131.2% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Jupiter (JUP) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 400 of 400 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Jupiter (JUP), Stochastic on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when Jupiter’s signal flips
We track Jupiter daily. Its backtested best indicator, Stochastic (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.