The best indicator for Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Comfort Systems USA (FIX) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Comfort Systems USA (FIX) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
WMA 200 Trend
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Comfort Systems USA (FIX) over ~29.4 years — beating buy-and-hold by 0.2% CAGR.
Comfort Systems USA (FIX) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Comfort Systems USA (FIX) — trailing buy-and-hold by 3.8% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WMA 200 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 18.2% | 0.72 | -70.2% | 39.1% | 23 | 0.2% |
| 2 | Markov Regime ✓ | Weekly | 17.0% | 0.7 | -59.0% | 50.9% | 53 | -1.0% |
| 3 | CCI (200) ✓ | Weekly | 19.3% | 0.74 | -61.1% | 28.6% | 14 | 1.3% |
| 4 | Negative Volume Index ✓ | Weekly | 15.3% | 0.68 | -54.5% | 61.1% | 18 | -2.7% |
| 5 | Vegas Tunnel ✓ | Weekly | 16.4% | 0.68 | -67.1% | 42.9% | 21 | -1.6% |
| 6 | EMA 200 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 16.9% | 0.67 | -72.1% | 43.5% | 23 | -1.1% |
| 7 | SMA 200 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 16.6% | 0.67 | -58.9% | 36.8% | 19 | -1.4% |
| 8 | CCI (100) ✓ | Weekly | 16.7% | 0.67 | -68.4% | 30.8% | 26 | -1.3% |
| 9 | Momentum (50) ✓ | Weekly | 16.7% | 0.67 | -65.1% | 43.8% | 48 | -1.3% |
| 10 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 20.8% | 0.66 | -78.8% | 23.5% | 34 | 2.6% |
| 11 | McGinley 200 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 19.0% | 0.66 | -81.2% | 26.7% | 15 | 1.0% |
| 12 | McGinley 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 19.8% | 0.64 | -82.5% | 31.6% | 38 | 1.7% |
| 13 | Zero-Lag LSMA ✓ | Weekly | 16.3% | 0.64 | -58.6% | 59.0% | 100 | -1.7% |
| 14 | EMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 15.4% | 0.64 | -68.4% | 38.2% | 34 | -2.6% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Comfort Systems USA (FIX)
1 of 652 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Comfort Systems USA (FIX) outright. Another 370 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 273 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| QQE | 1 | 1.26× | 2.11× |
| G-Channel | — | 1.32× | 2.36× |
| KAMA 200 Trend | — | 1.41× | 1.97× |
| Williams %R (50) | — | 1.41× | 2.31× |
| CCI (50) | — | 1.42× | 2.25× |
| ALMA 200 Trend | — | 1.44× | 2.24× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Comfort Systems USA (FIX), WMA 200 Trend on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Comfort Systems USA’s signal flips
We track Comfort Systems USA daily. Its backtested best indicator, WMA 200 Trend (Weekly), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.