The best indicator for Fair Isaac (FICO)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Fair Isaac (FICO) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Fair Isaac (FICO) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Camarilla Pivots
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Fair Isaac (FICO) over ~39.2 years — beating buy-and-hold by 17.1% CAGR.
Fair Isaac (FICO) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Fair Isaac (FICO) — trailing buy-and-hold by 10.8% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Daily | 34.4% | 1.02 | -95.5% | 51.6% | 1890 | 17.1% |
| 2 | Pivot Points (Standard) ✓ | Daily | 32.3% | 1.01 | -94.4% | 52.3% | 1418 | 15.1% |
| 3 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Daily | 31.6% | 0.99 | -95.7% | 52.5% | 1508 | 14.4% |
| 4 | Projection Bands ✓ | Daily | 25.2% | 0.86 | -85.9% | 59.1% | 386 | 8.0% |
| 5 | Lorentzian Classification ✓ | Daily | 23.6% | 0.83 | -77.9% | 48.5% | 2080 | 6.4% |
| 6 | MA Envelope ✓ | Daily | 21.3% | 0.75 | -83.4% | 56.8% | 317 | 4.0% |
| 7 | Parabolic SAR (fast) ✓ | Weekly | 18.3% | 0.72 | -44.3% | 55.8% | 138 | 1.3% |
| 8 | Lorentzian Classification ✓ | Weekly | 17.7% | 0.68 | -58.0% | 54.8% | 378 | 0.6% |
| 9 | Fisher Transform ✓ | Weekly | 16.3% | 0.67 | -59.8% | 53.1% | 192 | -0.7% |
| 10 | HMA 9/21 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 16.0% | 0.67 | -47.9% | 56.5% | 131 | -1.1% |
| 11 | Markov Regime ✓ | Daily | 19.1% | 0.63 | -79.3% | 36.1% | 144 | 1.9% |
| 12 | CCI ✓ | Weekly | 12.4% | 0.62 | -62.4% | 85.7% | 42 | -4.6% |
| 13 | Hull MA Trend ✓ | Weekly | 14.9% | 0.62 | -49.5% | 53.0% | 100 | -2.2% |
| 14 | Accelerator Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 14.4% | 0.62 | -64.1% | 57.1% | 119 | -2.7% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Fair Isaac (FICO)
0 of 677 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Fair Isaac (FICO) outright. Another 297 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 356 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sine-Weighted MA | — | 2.15× | 2.71× |
| QQE | — | 1.1× | 1.71× |
| ROC (30) | — | 1.2× | 1.91× |
| CMO (30) | — | 1.2× | 1.91× |
| Momentum (30) | — | 1.2× | 1.91× |
| CCI (50) | — | 1.26× | 2.84× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Fair Isaac (FICO), Camarilla Pivots on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Fair Isaac’s signal flips
We track Fair Isaac daily. Its backtested best indicator, Camarilla Pivots (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.