The best indicator for Cotton (CT)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Cotton (CT) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Cotton (CT) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
DEMA 20/50 Cross
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Cotton (CT) over ~26.8 years — beating buy-and-hold by 5.6% CAGR.
Cotton (CT) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Cotton (CT) — beating buy-and-hold by 1.4% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 7.0% | 0.42 | -51.2% | 47.1% | 17 | 5.6% |
| 2 | LSMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 6.3% | 0.42 | -44.1% | 46.9% | 32 | 4.8% |
| 3 | Volatility Regime (VIX-style) ✓ | Weekly | 5.1% | 0.42 | -39.9% | 44.9% | 49 | 3.7% |
| 4 | Coral Trend ✓ | Weekly | 6.4% | 0.4 | -51.9% | 51.9% | 27 | 5.0% |
| 5 | Historical Volatility Regime ✓ | Weekly | 4.8% | 0.39 | -42.6% | 44.2% | 43 | 3.4% |
| 6 | WMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 6.1% | 0.39 | -49.4% | 46.2% | 26 | 4.7% |
| 7 | MA Ribbon ✓ | Weekly | 5.2% | 0.38 | -40.5% | 53.3% | 15 | 3.8% |
| 8 | Hull MA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 5.5% | 0.37 | -41.3% | 34.3% | 35 | 4.1% |
| 9 | EMA 8/21 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 5.4% | 0.36 | -49.8% | 30.8% | 26 | 4.0% |
| 10 | Linear Regression Slope ✓ | Weekly | 5.4% | 0.36 | -54.7% | 54.5% | 33 | 4.0% |
| 11 | Chandelier Exit ✓ | Weekly | 5.6% | 0.36 | -61.8% | 44.1% | 59 | 4.2% |
| 12 | Correlation Trend ✓ | Weekly | 5.4% | 0.36 | -54.7% | 54.5% | 33 | 4.0% |
| 13 | EMA 9/26 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 5.5% | 0.36 | -53.6% | 31.8% | 22 | 4.1% |
| 14 | WMA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 5.2% | 0.35 | -50.2% | 34.0% | 94 | 3.5% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Cotton (CT) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 642 of 642 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Cotton (CT), DEMA 20/50 Cross on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More commodity
Get alerted when Cotton’s signal flips
We track Cotton daily. Its backtested best indicator, DEMA 20/50 Cross (Weekly), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.