The best indicator for BNB (BNB)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real BNB (BNB) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where BNB (BNB) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
MAMA / FAMA
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for BNB (BNB) over ~12.9 years — beating buy-and-hold by 22.7% CAGR.
BNB (BNB) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for BNB (BNB) — trailing buy-and-hold by 19.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAMA / FAMA ✓ | Daily | 81.4% | 1.24 | -66.5% | 40.6% | 64 | 22.7% |
| 2 | EMA 9/26 Cross ✓ | Daily | 78.0% | 1.22 | -61.2% | 45.3% | 53 | 19.3% |
| 3 | Jurik MA (approx.) ✓ | Weekly | 130.7% | 1.21 | -48.8% | 52.8% | 36 | 29.8% |
| 4 | Linear Regression Slope ✓ | Daily | 74.6% | 1.19 | -62.3% | 40.8% | 76 | 15.9% |
| 5 | Coppock Curve ✓ | Daily | 75.3% | 1.19 | -59.5% | 42.3% | 71 | 16.6% |
| 6 | Correlation Trend ✓ | Daily | 74.6% | 1.19 | -62.3% | 40.8% | 76 | 15.9% |
| 7 | Awesome Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 73.6% | 1.18 | -67.1% | 37.9% | 66 | 14.9% |
| 8 | Holt Double-Exp MA ✓ | Weekly | 123.7% | 1.18 | -54.7% | 50.0% | 36 | 22.8% |
| 9 | EMA 8/21 Cross ✓ | Daily | 73.0% | 1.17 | -68.3% | 43.5% | 69 | 14.3% |
| 10 | Cutler's RSI ✓ | Daily | 70.8% | 1.16 | -56.0% | 44.3% | 194 | 12.0% |
| 11 | Geometric MA ✓ | Daily | 70.2% | 1.16 | -64.7% | 41.9% | 160 | 11.4% |
| 12 | ROC (14) ✓ | Daily | 70.8% | 1.16 | -56.0% | 44.3% | 194 | 12.0% |
| 13 | CMO (14) ✓ | Daily | 70.8% | 1.16 | -56.0% | 44.3% | 194 | 12.0% |
| 14 | UT Bot (ATR Trailing) ✓ | Weekly | 121.5% | 1.16 | -50.9% | 56.0% | 25 | 20.6% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on BNB (BNB)
34 of 1183 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on BNB (BNB) outright. Another 207 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 140 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accumulation Swing Index | 1 | 1.02× | 2.37× |
| Swing Index | 1 | 1.02× | 2.37× |
| Woodie Pivots | 1 | 1.04× | 2.33× |
| TEMA 30 Trend | 1 | 1.34× | 2.55× |
| B-Xtrender | 1 | 1.4× | 2.93× |
| Holt Double-Exp MA | 1 | 1.64× | 2.91× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For BNB (BNB), MAMA / FAMA on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More crypto
Get alerted when BNB’s signal flips
We track BNB daily. Its backtested best indicator, MAMA / FAMA (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.