The best indicator for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Parabolic SAR (fast)
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) over ~52.6 years — beating buy-and-hold by 0.1% CAGR.
W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) — trailing buy-and-hold by 4.0% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parabolic SAR (fast) ✓ | Daily | 13.6% | 0.68 | -61.2% | 43.7% | 876 | 0.1% |
| 2 | Aroon ✓ | Daily | 13.5% | 0.66 | -53.9% | 43.8% | 480 | -0.0% |
| 3 | Aroon Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 13.5% | 0.66 | -53.9% | 43.8% | 480 | -0.0% |
| 4 | KAMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 11.8% | 0.64 | -56.2% | 66.7% | 24 | -2.0% |
| 5 | SMC: Change of Character ✓ | Weekly | 13.0% | 0.64 | -49.1% | 73.9% | 23 | -0.7% |
| 6 | Parabolic SAR ✓ | Daily | 12.0% | 0.62 | -57.7% | 44.5% | 564 | -1.6% |
| 7 | SMA 5/20 Cross ✓ | Daily | 12.1% | 0.62 | -57.4% | 43.7% | 391 | -1.4% |
| 8 | Ichimoku Cloud ✓ | Weekly | 11.5% | 0.62 | -54.7% | 47.8% | 46 | -2.3% |
| 9 | TRIMA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 10.8% | 0.61 | -52.7% | 46.2% | 91 | -2.7% |
| 10 | QQE ✓ | Weekly | 14.3% | 0.61 | -63.6% | 48.5% | 169 | 0.6% |
| 11 | CCI (100) ✓ | Weekly | 12.2% | 0.61 | -70.0% | 37.8% | 37 | -1.5% |
| 12 | Linear Regression Slope ✓ | Daily | 11.8% | 0.6 | -54.9% | 43.6% | 307 | -1.7% |
| 13 | Random Walk Index ✓ | Daily | 11.8% | 0.6 | -63.4% | 40.4% | 706 | -1.7% |
| 14 | Correlation Trend ✓ | Daily | 11.8% | 0.6 | -54.9% | 43.6% | 307 | -1.7% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB)
0 of 689 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) outright. Another 312 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 286 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| QQE | — | 1.25× | 2.89× |
| Trend Regularity Adaptive MA | — | 1.59× | 4.17× |
| Chandelier Exit | — | 1.62× | 3.9× |
| CCI (50) | — | 1.67× | 4.55× |
| Bandpass Oscillator | — | 1.72× | 3.37× |
| Demand Index | — | 1.82× | 2.88× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB), Parabolic SAR (fast) on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when W. R. Berkley Corporation’s signal flips
We track W. R. Berkley Corporation daily. Its backtested best indicator, Parabolic SAR (fast) (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.