The best indicator for United Airlines Holdings (UAL)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real United Airlines Holdings (UAL) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where United Airlines Holdings (UAL) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Volume Zone Oscillator
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for United Airlines Holdings (UAL) over ~20.3 years — beating buy-and-hold by 12.8% CAGR.
United Airlines Holdings (UAL) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for United Airlines Holdings (UAL) — trailing buy-and-hold by 5.6% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volume Zone Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 18.9% | 0.6 | -59.8% | 45.5% | 477 | 12.8% |
| 2 | McGinley Dynamic ✓ | Daily | 15.1% | 0.52 | -68.3% | 35.8% | 246 | 9.0% |
| 3 | Stochastic Momentum Index ✓ | Weekly | 14.2% | 0.52 | -75.0% | 76.2% | 21 | 8.1% |
| 4 | McGinley 30 Trend ✓ | Daily | 13.9% | 0.51 | -85.5% | 37.5% | 24 | 7.8% |
| 5 | LSMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 15.5% | 0.51 | -65.4% | 58.1% | 43 | 9.5% |
| 6 | Ease of Movement ✓ | Daily | 12.3% | 0.49 | -63.9% | 46.2% | 260 | 6.1% |
| 7 | Ehlers Reflex ✓ | Weekly | 14.0% | 0.49 | -59.0% | 50.0% | 36 | 7.9% |
| 8 | Stochastic RSI ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.48 | -75.1% | 75.9% | 29 | 5.4% |
| 9 | Elder Ray (Bull/Bear Power) ✓ | Daily | 12.1% | 0.48 | -58.8% | 42.9% | 308 | 5.9% |
| 10 | ROC (5) ✓ | Daily | 11.9% | 0.47 | -68.1% | 41.7% | 503 | 5.8% |
| 11 | Arnaud Legoux MA ✓ | Daily | 11.5% | 0.46 | -60.7% | 41.2% | 478 | 5.4% |
| 12 | Sine-Weighted MA ✓ | Daily | 11.6% | 0.46 | -74.8% | 36.5% | 277 | 5.5% |
| 13 | Pascal's Weighted MA ✓ | Daily | 10.1% | 0.46 | -65.0% | 45.9% | 255 | 3.9% |
| 14 | Woodie Pivots ✓ | Daily | 11.4% | 0.46 | -55.2% | 46.5% | 1106 | 5.3% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on United Airlines Holdings (UAL)
12 of 630 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on United Airlines Holdings (UAL) outright. Another 82 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 282 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zero-Lag MACD | 2 | 1.6× | 2.58× |
| Williams %R | 1 | 1.08× | 2.78× |
| Accelerator Oscillator | 1 | 1.4× | 1.95× |
| Chande Forecast Osc. | 1 | 1.48× | 2.44× |
| MA Envelope | 1 | 1.64× | 2.68× |
| Stochastic | 1 | none needed | 1.96× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For United Airlines Holdings (UAL), Volume Zone Oscillator on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when United Airlines Holdings’s signal flips
We track United Airlines Holdings daily. Its backtested best indicator, Volume Zone Oscillator (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.