The best indicator for T-Mobile US (TMUS)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real T-Mobile US (TMUS) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where T-Mobile US (TMUS) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Ulcer Index
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for T-Mobile US (TMUS) over ~19.5 years — beating buy-and-hold by 4.2% CAGR.
T-Mobile US (TMUS) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for T-Mobile US (TMUS) — beating buy-and-hold by 2.5% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ulcer Index ✓ | Weekly | 11.0% | 0.7 | -26.6% | 50.0% | 20 | 4.2% |
| 2 | Chaikin Volatility ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.61 | -32.0% | 60.0% | 55 | 2.5% |
| 3 | TEMA 20/50 Cross | Weekly | 10.7% | 0.58 | -46.8% | 62.5% | 24 | 3.9% |
| 4 | T3 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 9.4% | 0.54 | -39.4% | 47.3% | 55 | 2.3% |
| 5 | Historical Volatility Regime ✓ | Weekly | 8.4% | 0.54 | -51.0% | 57.9% | 19 | 1.6% |
| 6 | Hull MA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 8.6% | 0.54 | -36.8% | 41.9% | 31 | 1.8% |
| 7 | ZLEMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 9.2% | 0.54 | -49.9% | 54.5% | 33 | 2.3% |
| 8 | DEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 12.0% | 0.62 | -47.6% | 76.9% | 13 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Trend Intensity Index ✓ | Daily | 10.3% | 0.52 | -61.6% | 44.8% | 29 | 3.2% |
| 10 | VWAP Bands ✓ | Daily | 8.7% | 0.52 | -33.7% | 67.9% | 81 | 1.7% |
| 11 | T3 20/80 Cross ✓ | Daily | 10.1% | 0.52 | -49.8% | 53.6% | 28 | 3.0% |
| 12 | Trend Regularity Adaptive MA ✓ | Weekly | 8.3% | 0.52 | -33.8% | 56.5% | 23 | 1.5% |
| 13 | Supertrend (7,2) ✓ | Weekly | 10.2% | 0.52 | -50.6% | 54.5% | 22 | 3.4% |
| 14 | Adaptive Supertrend ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.51 | -60.9% | 52.0% | 25 | 2.4% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on T-Mobile US (TMUS)
20 of 591 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on T-Mobile US (TMUS) outright. Another 174 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 155 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connors RSI | 1 | 2.07× | 5.2× |
| Projection Bands | 1 | 2.21× | 4.96× |
| Vortex | 1 | 2.93× | 3.89× |
| Detrended Price Osc. | 1 | none needed | 3.34× |
| Price Volume Trend | 1 | none needed | 3.74× |
| Random Walk Index | 1 | none needed | 3.41× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For T-Mobile US (TMUS), Ulcer Index on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when T-Mobile US’s signal flips
We track T-Mobile US daily. Its backtested best indicator, Ulcer Index (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.