The best indicator for Constellation Brands (STZ)
We backtested 366 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Constellation Brands (STZ) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Camarilla Pivots
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Constellation Brands (STZ) over ~34.3 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 0.5% CAGR.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Constellation Brands (STZ) — trailing buy-and-hold by 6.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Weekly | 13.9% | 0.67 | -46.2% | 54.8% | 361 | -0.5% |
| 2 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Weekly | 12.2% | 0.64 | -46.0% | 54.3% | 280 | -2.2% |
| 3 | Parabolic SAR (fast) ✓ | Weekly | 10.8% | 0.58 | -39.5% | 52.8% | 127 | -3.6% |
| 4 | Net Volume ✓ | Daily | 10.9% | 0.57 | -57.9% | 46.9% | 367 | -3.8% |
| 5 | Liquidity Flow Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 10.9% | 0.57 | -57.9% | 46.9% | 367 | -3.8% |
| 6 | EMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.56 | -44.9% | 56.2% | 16 | -3.0% |
| 7 | Lorentzian Classification ✓ | Weekly | 11.0% | 0.56 | -54.7% | 53.4% | 326 | -3.4% |
| 8 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 12.4% | 0.54 | -56.1% | 36.4% | 44 | -2.2% |
| 9 | Pivot Points (Standard) ✓ | Weekly | 9.6% | 0.54 | -52.5% | 53.6% | 250 | -4.8% |
| 10 | Trend-Gated Asymmetric ✓ | Weekly | 7.2% | 0.54 | -33.6% | 50.0% | 36 | -7.2% |
| 11 | Volume Flow Indicator ✓ | Daily | 11.1% | 0.53 | -59.5% | 38.6% | 83 | -3.5% |
| 12 | Stochastic ✓ | Weekly | 8.4% | 0.53 | -46.0% | 87.9% | 33 | -6.0% |
| 13 | KAMA 200 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.53 | -53.3% | 46.9% | 32 | -3.0% |
| 14 | VIDYA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 11.5% | 0.52 | -57.3% | 35.3% | 34 | -3.1% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
For Constellation Brands (STZ), Camarilla Pivots on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get the weekly edge report
The best-performing indicator per asset, what changed this week, and the honest caveats — straight to your inbox.