The best indicator for Royal Caribbean Group (RCL)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Hull MA 20/80 Cross
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) over ~33.1 years — beating buy-and-hold by 7.3% CAGR.
Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) — beating buy-and-hold by 1.4% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hull MA 20/80 Cross ✓ | Daily | 19.8% | 0.73 | -50.7% | 50.3% | 187 | 7.3% |
| 2 | CCI (30) ✓ | Daily | 19.4% | 0.73 | -56.0% | 37.9% | 285 | 6.9% |
| 3 | VWAP Trend ✓ | Daily | 19.5% | 0.72 | -43.2% | 42.9% | 450 | 7.0% |
| 4 | CCI Trend ✓ | Daily | 19.4% | 0.72 | -54.0% | 40.6% | 374 | 6.9% |
| 5 | Price Volume Trend ✓ | Daily | 20.1% | 0.72 | -71.5% | 41.1% | 326 | 7.6% |
| 6 | WMA 30 Trend ✓ | Daily | 18.2% | 0.72 | -50.2% | 44.4% | 399 | 5.7% |
| 7 | Fractal Adaptive MA ✓ | Weekly | 17.6% | 0.72 | -42.3% | 54.0% | 198 | 5.2% |
| 8 | SMC: Order Block ✓ | Daily | 19.6% | 0.72 | -46.8% | 40.9% | 220 | 7.1% |
| 9 | Vortex ✓ | Daily | 18.4% | 0.7 | -55.6% | 42.0% | 398 | 5.9% |
| 10 | Force Index ✓ | Daily | 18.8% | 0.7 | -57.7% | 43.3% | 439 | 6.3% |
| 11 | Williams Fractals ✓ | Daily | 17.8% | 0.69 | -54.8% | 44.4% | 187 | 5.3% |
| 12 | Ehlers SuperSmoother ✓ | Weekly | 17.9% | 0.69 | -60.4% | 46.6% | 223 | 5.5% |
| 13 | McGinley Dynamic ✓ | Daily | 19.3% | 0.68 | -59.7% | 35.9% | 382 | 6.8% |
| 14 | TSI (13,7) ✓ | Daily | 17.4% | 0.68 | -55.6% | 39.8% | 246 | 4.9% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Royal Caribbean Group (RCL)
128 of 688 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) outright. Another 233 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 271 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zero-Lag MACD | 2 | 1.19× | 2.1× |
| TEMA 20/50 Cross | 2 | none needed | 3.19× |
| Vortex | 2 | none needed | 2.29× |
| Ease of Movement | 2 | none needed | 2.22× |
| Least Squares MA | 2 | none needed | 2.29× |
| Sine-Weighted MA | 2 | none needed | 1.7× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Royal Caribbean Group (RCL), Hull MA 20/80 Cross on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Royal Caribbean Group’s signal flips
We track Royal Caribbean Group daily. Its backtested best indicator, Hull MA 20/80 Cross (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.