The best indicator for Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
FRAMA 30 Trend
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) over ~21.6 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 4.6% CAGR.
Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) — trailing buy-and-hold by 7.8% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRAMA 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 22.4% | 0.86 | -35.3% | 54.4% | 103 | -4.6% |
| 2 | Rainbow MA ✓ | Weekly | 22.7% | 0.82 | -56.3% | 55.8% | 120 | -4.3% |
| 3 | Arnaud Legoux MA ✓ | Weekly | 22.6% | 0.81 | -45.2% | 53.6% | 97 | -4.4% |
| 4 | Fractal Adaptive MA ✓ | Weekly | 21.0% | 0.81 | -54.6% | 54.3% | 127 | -6.0% |
| 5 | Chande Kroll Stop ✓ | Weekly | 25.8% | 0.79 | -65.1% | 51.2% | 43 | -1.2% |
| 6 | Disparity (5) ✓ | Weekly | 21.9% | 0.79 | -45.2% | 51.5% | 130 | -5.1% |
| 7 | Ehlers SuperSmoother ✓ | Weekly | 21.4% | 0.78 | -42.5% | 54.5% | 143 | -5.6% |
| 8 | QQE ✓ | Daily | 28.1% | 0.77 | -67.8% | 47.0% | 313 | 0.9% |
| 9 | ROC (20) ✓ | Weekly | 22.2% | 0.77 | -54.7% | 64.3% | 42 | -4.8% |
| 10 | Momentum (20) ✓ | Weekly | 22.2% | 0.77 | -54.7% | 64.3% | 42 | -4.8% |
| 11 | Q-Stick ✓ | Weekly | 21.2% | 0.76 | -49.0% | 53.3% | 90 | -5.8% |
| 12 | Trade Volume Index ✓ | Weekly | 20.7% | 0.76 | -44.5% | 53.3% | 60 | -6.3% |
| 13 | Markov Regime ✓ | Daily | 27.7% | 0.76 | -72.3% | 56.4% | 39 | 0.6% |
| 14 | Money Flow Index ✓ | Daily | 18.6% | 0.75 | -46.3% | 82.6% | 23 | -8.6% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
3 of 639 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) outright. Another 159 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 351 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pivot Points (Standard) | 1 | none needed | 2.74× |
| Camarilla Pivots | 1 | none needed | 2.23× |
| Fibonacci Pivots | 1 | none needed | 2.59× |
| Zero-Lag MACD | — | 1.09× | 2.46× |
| QQE | — | 1.18× | 1.94× |
| DeMarker (7) | — | 1.68× | 2.74× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), FRAMA 30 Trend on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Monolithic Power Systems’s signal flips
We track Monolithic Power Systems daily. Its backtested best indicator, FRAMA 30 Trend (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.