The best indicator for Las Vegas Sands (LVS)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Las Vegas Sands (LVS) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Las Vegas Sands (LVS) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Chandelier Exit
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Las Vegas Sands (LVS) over ~21.6 years — beating buy-and-hold by 22.1% CAGR.
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Las Vegas Sands (LVS) — beating buy-and-hold by 7.3% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chandelier Exit ✓ | Weekly | 24.0% | 0.75 | -48.1% | 51.5% | 33 | 22.1% |
| 2 | Hull MA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 16.9% | 0.65 | -58.3% | 42.2% | 90 | 14.3% |
| 3 | FRAMA 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 17.7% | 0.64 | -55.0% | 52.9% | 102 | 15.8% |
| 4 | Chaikin Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 15.9% | 0.62 | -55.9% | 38.3% | 60 | 14.0% |
| 5 | A/D Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 15.9% | 0.62 | -55.9% | 38.3% | 60 | 14.0% |
| 6 | LSMA 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 15.5% | 0.62 | -51.1% | 51.9% | 77 | 13.5% |
| 7 | Cascade Z-Score | Daily | 15.1% | 0.61 | -54.8% | 45.4% | 152 | 12.6% |
| 8 | Bollinger Breakout | Daily | 13.0% | 0.6 | -51.2% | 48.9% | 88 | 10.5% |
| 9 | Pascal's Weighted MA | Daily | 13.6% | 0.6 | -50.7% | 46.1% | 269 | 11.1% |
| 10 | SMC: Fair Value Gap ✓ | Weekly | 15.1% | 0.59 | -41.8% | 47.8% | 46 | 13.1% |
| 11 | Chop Zone (EMA-34 angle) ✓ | Daily | 11.1% | 0.59 | -36.4% | 45.3% | 106 | 8.6% |
| 12 | Aroon ✓ | Weekly | 14.5% | 0.58 | -37.2% | 52.8% | 36 | 12.5% |
| 13 | Aroon Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 14.5% | 0.58 | -37.2% | 52.8% | 36 | 12.5% |
| 14 | ADX / DMI | Daily | 12.6% | 0.57 | -61.4% | 41.2% | 136 | 10.1% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Las Vegas Sands (LVS) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 610 of 610 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Las Vegas Sands (LVS), Chandelier Exit on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Las Vegas Sands’s signal flips
We track Las Vegas Sands daily. Its backtested best indicator, Chandelier Exit (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.