The best indicator for Lockheed Martin (LMT)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Lockheed Martin (LMT) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Lockheed Martin (LMT) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Andean Oscillator
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Lockheed Martin (LMT) over ~64.3 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 1.6% CAGR.
Lockheed Martin (LMT) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Lockheed Martin (LMT) — trailing buy-and-hold by 4.5% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andean Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 8.9% | 0.51 | -67.0% | 48.3% | 321 | -1.6% |
| 2 | VIDYA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 10.4% | 0.51 | -59.9% | 42.3% | 26 | -0.1% |
| 3 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 11.6% | 0.51 | -77.3% | 35.0% | 20 | 1.1% |
| 4 | CCI (200) ✓ | Weekly | 10.3% | 0.5 | -58.2% | 43.5% | 23 | -0.3% |
| 5 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 10.9% | 0.49 | -89.5% | 29.7% | 74 | 0.4% |
| 6 | Chandelier Exit ✓ | Weekly | 10.1% | 0.49 | -92.5% | 45.8% | 131 | -0.4% |
| 7 | Zero-Lag MACD ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.49 | -71.9% | 55.2% | 281 | -1.3% |
| 8 | Fisher Center-of-Gravity ✓ | Weekly | 7.7% | 0.49 | -45.0% | 52.8% | 335 | -2.8% |
| 9 | Zero-Lag MACD ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.49 | -71.9% | 55.2% | 281 | -1.3% |
| 10 | McGinley 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 10.8% | 0.48 | -88.1% | 15.9% | 63 | 0.3% |
| 11 | Vortex (7) ✓ | Weekly | 9.0% | 0.48 | -60.9% | 44.1% | 222 | -1.5% |
| 12 | PMax ✓ | Weekly | 9.5% | 0.48 | -64.0% | 60.0% | 15 | -1.0% |
| 13 | McGinley 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 10.5% | 0.47 | -86.1% | 37.1% | 35 | -0.0% |
| 14 | Hull MA Trend ✓ | Weekly | 8.6% | 0.46 | -75.2% | 46.7% | 169 | -1.9% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Lockheed Martin (LMT)
0 of 726 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Lockheed Martin (LMT) outright. Another 293 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 344 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| QQE | — | 1.38× | 2.08× |
| Zero-Lag MACD | — | 1.44× | 2.6× |
| T3 10/40 Cross | — | 1.47× | 3.42× |
| SMA 15/60 Cross | — | 1.54× | 2.76× |
| TRIX (15) | — | 1.63× | 3.13× |
| WMA 20/80 Cross | — | 1.67× | 3.04× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Lockheed Martin (LMT), Andean Oscillator on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Lockheed Martin’s signal flips
We track Lockheed Martin daily. Its backtested best indicator, Andean Oscillator (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.