The best indicator for Kimberly-Clark (KMB)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Kimberly-Clark (KMB) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Kimberly-Clark (KMB) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Murrey Math Lines
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Kimberly-Clark (KMB) over ~46.7 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 6.0% CAGR.
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Kimberly-Clark (KMB) — trailing buy-and-hold by 8.2% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murrey Math Lines ✓ | Weekly | 5.4% | 0.63 | -21.3% | 83.3% | 30 | -6.0% |
| 2 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Weekly | 7.2% | 0.6 | -26.6% | 59.6% | 359 | -4.2% |
| 3 | Bollinger Mean-Reversion ✓ | Weekly | 4.7% | 0.57 | -25.7% | 81.2% | 32 | -6.7% |
| 4 | Keltner Mean-Reversion ✓ | Weekly | 3.8% | 0.57 | -25.7% | 90.9% | 22 | -7.6% |
| 5 | Fibonacci Bands ✓ | Weekly | 4.7% | 0.57 | -25.7% | 81.2% | 32 | -6.7% |
| 6 | Keltner Mean-Reversion ✓ | Daily | 5.6% | 0.55 | -26.6% | 70.2% | 141 | -5.7% |
| 7 | VIDYA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 10.1% | 0.54 | -42.4% | 50.0% | 18 | -1.2% |
| 8 | Pivot Points (Standard) ✓ | Weekly | 6.2% | 0.54 | -25.7% | 60.2% | 327 | -5.2% |
| 9 | Ultimate Oscillator ✓ | Daily | 6.9% | 0.53 | -34.4% | 82.2% | 45 | -4.5% |
| 10 | MA Envelope ✓ | Weekly | 5.9% | 0.53 | -25.7% | 70.6% | 85 | -5.5% |
| 11 | SMC: Liquidity Sweep ✓ | Daily | 7.0% | 0.51 | -35.4% | 69.5% | 154 | -4.3% |
| 12 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Weekly | 6.3% | 0.51 | -22.9% | 57.7% | 480 | -5.1% |
| 13 | Markov Regime ✓ | Weekly | 8.7% | 0.51 | -35.5% | 72.2% | 18 | -2.7% |
| 14 | Stochastic ✓ | Daily | 6.5% | 0.5 | -32.7% | 72.2% | 212 | -4.8% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Kimberly-Clark (KMB)
11 of 722 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Kimberly-Clark (KMB) outright. Another 70 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 81 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bollinger Mean-Reversion | 1 | 1.04× | 6.5× |
| Fibonacci Bands | 1 | 1.04× | 6.5× |
| Murrey Math Lines | 1 | 1.07× | 4.55× |
| SMC: Liquidity Sweep | 1 | 1.11× | 3.78× |
| Demand Index | 1 | 1.52× | 4.1× |
| Williams %R | 1 | 2.09× | 3.54× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Kimberly-Clark (KMB), Murrey Math Lines on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Kimberly-Clark’s signal flips
We track Kimberly-Clark daily. Its backtested best indicator, Murrey Math Lines (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.