The best indicator for Ingersoll Rand (IR)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Ingersoll Rand (IR) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Ingersoll Rand (IR) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Williams %R (50)
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Ingersoll Rand (IR) over ~9.4 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 1.1% CAGR.
Ingersoll Rand (IR) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Ingersoll Rand (IR) — trailing buy-and-hold by 8.2% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams %R (50) ✓ | Daily | 14.6% | 0.72 | -25.2% | 33.3% | 66 | -1.1% |
| 2 | Stochastic RSI ✓ | Daily | 12.7% | 0.71 | -27.3% | 68.1% | 72 | -3.0% |
| 3 | Price Volume Trend | Daily | 14.4% | 0.71 | -37.5% | 44.1% | 102 | -1.3% |
| 4 | Zero-Lag LSMA ✓ | Weekly | 13.0% | 0.71 | -23.6% | 62.1% | 29 | -2.4% |
| 5 | Relative Volatility Index ✓ | Weekly | 16.1% | 0.69 | -40.5% | 43.8% | 16 | 0.8% |
| 6 | WaveTrend (8/6/4) ✓ | Daily | 14.3% | 0.68 | -31.2% | 66.7% | 33 | -1.4% |
| 7 | FRAMA 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 13.3% | 0.66 | -29.8% | 42.2% | 192 | -2.4% |
| 8 | Relative Vigor Index ✓ | Daily | 13.5% | 0.64 | -36.9% | 49.5% | 188 | -2.2% |
| 9 | Deviation-Scaled MA ✓ | Weekly | 13.6% | 0.64 | -31.5% | 49.0% | 49 | -1.7% |
| 10 | CCI ✓ | Daily | 12.2% | 0.63 | -31.8% | 71.7% | 46 | -3.5% |
| 11 | CCI (50) ✓ | Daily | 12.5% | 0.63 | -32.8% | 39.6% | 53 | -3.2% |
| 12 | Supertrend Fast (10,2) ✓ | Daily | 12.2% | 0.62 | -23.5% | 45.6% | 57 | -3.5% |
| 13 | Chande Forecast Osc. ✓ | Daily | 13.0% | 0.62 | -30.3% | 52.7% | 258 | -2.7% |
| 14 | LSMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 12.6% | 0.62 | -30.6% | 42.4% | 99 | -3.1% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Ingersoll Rand (IR)
76 of 456 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Ingersoll Rand (IR) outright. Another 33 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 22 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative Vigor Index | 2 | none needed | 3.46× |
| Median MA | 2 | none needed | 5.08× |
| Ehlers Relative Vigor | 2 | none needed | 3.4× |
| Pivot Points (Standard) | 2 | none needed | 6.51× |
| Fisher Center-of-Gravity | 1 | 2.69× | 5.02× |
| RSI Trend (>50) | 1 | none needed | 3.6× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Ingersoll Rand (IR), Williams %R (50) on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Ingersoll Rand’s signal flips
We track Ingersoll Rand daily. Its backtested best indicator, Williams %R (50) (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.