The best indicator for Invitation Homes (INVH)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Invitation Homes (INVH) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Invitation Homes (INVH) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Volume Oscillator
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Invitation Homes (INVH) over ~9.4 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 1.4% CAGR.
Invitation Homes (INVH) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Invitation Homes (INVH) — trailing buy-and-hold by 3.7% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volume Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 5.3% | 0.61 | -19.0% | 59.3% | 27 | -1.4% |
| 2 | Keltner Mean-Reversion ✓ | Daily | 8.4% | 0.59 | -43.3% | 75.0% | 32 | 1.2% |
| 3 | FRAMA 100 Trend | Weekly | 7.1% | 0.56 | -34.4% | 44.4% | 27 | 0.3% |
| 4 | Bollinger Mean-Reversion ✓ | Daily | 7.5% | 0.52 | -47.5% | 79.1% | 43 | 0.4% |
| 5 | Fibonacci Bands ✓ | Daily | 7.5% | 0.52 | -47.5% | 79.1% | 43 | 0.4% |
| 6 | McGinley 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 8.1% | 0.55 | -29.5% | 42.9% | 14 | 1.0% |
| 7 | Projection Bands ✓ | Daily | 6.8% | 0.5 | -27.0% | 63.7% | 80 | -0.4% |
| 8 | Laguerre RSI ✓ | Weekly | 7.3% | 0.56 | -18.5% | 53.8% | 13 | 0.5% |
| 9 | Relative Volume Spike | Daily | 2.6% | 0.47 | -14.0% | 31.4% | 35 | -4.5% |
| 10 | Order-Flow Reversion ✓ | Daily | 6.3% | 0.46 | -47.5% | 78.4% | 37 | -0.8% |
| 11 | Supertrend (20,3) | Daily | 6.1% | 0.43 | -28.0% | 36.7% | 30 | -1.1% |
| 12 | Bandpass Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 5.5% | 0.43 | -31.9% | 41.7% | 24 | -1.2% |
| 13 | LSMA 100 Trend | Weekly | 4.1% | 0.43 | -24.2% | 46.7% | 15 | -2.7% |
| 14 | CCI ✓ | Daily | 6.2% | 0.42 | -47.5% | 68.8% | 48 | -0.9% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Invitation Homes (INVH) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 467 of 467 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Invitation Homes (INVH), Volume Oscillator on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Invitation Homes’s signal flips
We track Invitation Homes daily. Its backtested best indicator, Volume Oscillator (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.