The best indicator for Generac (GNRC)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Generac (GNRC) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Generac (GNRC) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
FRAMA 10/30 Cross
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Generac (GNRC) over ~16.4 years — beating buy-and-hold by 2.5% CAGR.
Generac (GNRC) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Generac (GNRC) — trailing buy-and-hold by 9.2% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRAMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 25.5% | 0.85 | -32.1% | 57.4% | 61 | 2.5% |
| 2 | Awesome Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 24.0% | 0.83 | -35.3% | 64.7% | 17 | 1.1% |
| 3 | Williams Fractals ✓ | Weekly | 24.5% | 0.88 | -46.6% | 71.4% | 14 | 1.6% |
| 4 | Donchian 55/20 ✓ | Daily | 19.8% | 0.81 | -40.0% | 73.1% | 26 | -3.6% |
| 5 | Geometric MA ✓ | Weekly | 21.6% | 0.81 | -34.8% | 57.4% | 47 | -1.4% |
| 6 | Donchian 20 Break ✓ | Daily | 22.4% | 0.8 | -47.6% | 63.2% | 38 | -1.0% |
| 7 | Chaikin Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 23.5% | 0.8 | -37.4% | 48.8% | 41 | 0.6% |
| 8 | A/D Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 23.5% | 0.8 | -37.4% | 48.8% | 41 | 0.6% |
| 9 | KAMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 23.3% | 0.8 | -36.4% | 40.9% | 22 | 0.4% |
| 10 | Ehlers Stochastic ✓ | Weekly | 22.2% | 0.79 | -45.0% | 63.2% | 19 | -0.8% |
| 11 | Accumulation/Distribution ✓ | Weekly | 22.4% | 0.78 | -47.0% | 63.3% | 49 | -0.6% |
| 12 | Twiggs Money Flow ✓ | Weekly | 22.6% | 0.78 | -47.0% | 59.1% | 44 | -0.4% |
| 13 | Supertrend (7,2) ✓ | Weekly | 21.9% | 0.78 | -35.1% | 77.8% | 18 | -1.0% |
| 14 | Delta Volume (CVD proxy) ✓ | Weekly | 22.4% | 0.78 | -51.9% | 55.8% | 43 | -0.5% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Generac (GNRC) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 562 of 562 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Generac (GNRC), FRAMA 10/30 Cross on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Generac’s signal flips
We track Generac daily. Its backtested best indicator, FRAMA 10/30 Cross (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.