The best indicator for Fidelity National Information Services (FIS)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
RSI Trend (>50)
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) over ~25.4 years — beating buy-and-hold by 4.2% CAGR.
Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) — trailing buy-and-hold by 3.0% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RSI Trend (>50) ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.61 | -40.6% | 52.1% | 48 | 4.2% |
| 2 | EMA 8/21 Cross | Weekly | 8.5% | 0.57 | -51.3% | 52.4% | 21 | 3.4% |
| 3 | Historical Volatility Regime ✓ | Weekly | 6.3% | 0.57 | -28.8% | 62.1% | 29 | 1.2% |
| 4 | TRIX (9) ✓ | Weekly | 8.7% | 0.57 | -35.8% | 63.2% | 19 | 3.6% |
| 5 | Linear Regression Slope ✓ | Weekly | 8.2% | 0.55 | -40.3% | 63.0% | 27 | 3.1% |
| 6 | Correlation Trend ✓ | Weekly | 8.2% | 0.55 | -40.3% | 63.0% | 27 | 3.1% |
| 7 | Elastic VW MA ✓ | Weekly | 8.3% | 0.55 | -35.9% | 44.7% | 38 | 3.2% |
| 8 | Aroon | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.54 | -54.6% | 63.2% | 38 | 3.0% |
| 9 | Aroon Oscillator | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.54 | -54.6% | 63.2% | 38 | 3.0% |
| 10 | RSI (21) ✓ | Weekly | 7.9% | 0.54 | -33.0% | 43.8% | 32 | 2.8% |
| 11 | Donchian Breakout ✓ | Weekly | 7.0% | 0.53 | -40.7% | 53.3% | 15 | 1.9% |
| 12 | Williams %R (50) ✓ | Weekly | 7.5% | 0.53 | -32.3% | 68.2% | 22 | 2.4% |
| 13 | Supertrend (20,3) ✓ | Weekly | 7.6% | 0.53 | -34.0% | 46.7% | 15 | 2.5% |
| 14 | Ichimoku TK Cross | Weekly | 7.5% | 0.52 | -45.0% | 64.3% | 28 | 2.4% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) lost money across the out-of-sample window in 617 of 617 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), RSI Trend (>50) on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Fidelity National Information Services’s signal flips
We track Fidelity National Information Services daily. Its backtested best indicator, RSI Trend (>50) (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.