The best indicator for EQT Corporation (EQT)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real EQT Corporation (EQT) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where EQT Corporation (EQT) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
WaveTrend (8/6/4)
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for EQT Corporation (EQT) over ~46.2 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 1.2% CAGR.
EQT Corporation (EQT) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for EQT Corporation (EQT) — trailing buy-and-hold by 8.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WaveTrend (8/6/4) ✓ | Daily | 10.9% | 0.57 | -67.9% | 71.3% | 181 | -1.2% |
| 2 | McGinley Dynamic ✓ | Weekly | 11.9% | 0.54 | -68.7% | 40.2% | 82 | -0.1% |
| 3 | Coral Trend ✓ | Weekly | 10.6% | 0.54 | -59.9% | 49.0% | 49 | -1.5% |
| 4 | Chande Kroll Stop ✓ | Daily | 11.9% | 0.53 | -78.6% | 39.2% | 684 | -0.1% |
| 5 | DeMarker (14) ✓ | Weekly | 10.3% | 0.53 | -42.3% | 55.6% | 108 | -1.7% |
| 6 | McGinley 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 10.7% | 0.52 | -67.9% | 39.8% | 88 | -1.4% |
| 7 | T3 20/80 Cross ✓ | Daily | 9.8% | 0.52 | -59.5% | 55.4% | 65 | -2.3% |
| 8 | Vortex ✓ | Weekly | 9.8% | 0.52 | -47.6% | 55.9% | 118 | -2.2% |
| 9 | Random Walk Index ✓ | Weekly | 10.0% | 0.52 | -47.6% | 55.2% | 116 | -2.0% |
| 10 | Instantaneous Trendline ✓ | Weekly | 10.0% | 0.52 | -57.0% | 45.1% | 102 | -2.0% |
| 11 | Random Walk Index ✓ | Weekly | 10.0% | 0.52 | -47.6% | 55.2% | 116 | -2.0% |
| 12 | Chande Kroll Stop ✓ | Weekly | 11.5% | 0.51 | -79.3% | 45.3% | 128 | -0.5% |
| 13 | VIDYA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 9.9% | 0.5 | -51.5% | 43.1% | 51 | -2.2% |
| 14 | Coppock Curve ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.5 | -55.4% | 61.1% | 54 | -2.7% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on EQT Corporation (EQT)
98 of 692 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on EQT Corporation (EQT) outright. Another 58 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 138 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connors RSI | 2 | none needed | 1.6× |
| Chande Kroll Stop | 2 | none needed | 1.27× |
| SMC: Order Block | 2 | none needed | 1.72× |
| Know Sure Thing | 1 | 1.15× | 1.55× |
| Three White Soldiers | 1 | 1.2× | 1.65× |
| Stochastic RSI | 1 | 1.26× | 1.74× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For EQT Corporation (EQT), WaveTrend (8/6/4) on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when EQT Corporation’s signal flips
We track EQT Corporation daily. Its backtested best indicator, WaveTrend (8/6/4) (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.