The best indicator for Domino's (DPZ)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Domino's (DPZ) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Domino's (DPZ) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Vortex (7)
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Domino's (DPZ) over ~22.3 years — beating buy-and-hold by 1.4% CAGR.
Domino's (DPZ) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Domino's (DPZ) — trailing buy-and-hold by 17.4% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vortex (7) ✓ | Weekly | 20.3% | 0.9 | -36.5% | 51.6% | 64 | 1.4% |
| 2 | Twiggs Money Flow ✓ | Weekly | 19.5% | 0.83 | -35.3% | 50.0% | 68 | 0.6% |
| 3 | Historical Volatility Regime ✓ | Weekly | 15.5% | 0.83 | -33.3% | 64.7% | 34 | -3.5% |
| 4 | Ichimoku TK Cross ✓ | Daily | 18.4% | 0.82 | -42.9% | 56.6% | 129 | -0.9% |
| 5 | Volume Flow Indicator ✓ | Daily | 18.6% | 0.82 | -32.0% | 59.5% | 37 | -0.8% |
| 6 | SMC: Order Block ✓ | Weekly | 18.2% | 0.82 | -27.2% | 50.0% | 26 | -0.7% |
| 7 | SMC: Fair Value Gap ✓ | Weekly | 18.3% | 0.81 | -49.7% | 53.8% | 39 | -0.7% |
| 8 | VIDYA 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 18.1% | 0.8 | -51.9% | 50.0% | 16 | -0.8% |
| 9 | WMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Daily | 17.8% | 0.79 | -47.5% | 51.6% | 64 | -1.5% |
| 10 | VIDYA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 18.7% | 0.79 | -37.1% | 55.0% | 20 | -0.7% |
| 11 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 21.8% | 0.79 | -61.1% | 29.4% | 17 | 2.4% |
| 12 | VIDYA ✓ | Weekly | 18.0% | 0.79 | -41.1% | 52.8% | 36 | -1.0% |
| 13 | WMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 16.9% | 0.79 | -44.4% | 54.2% | 24 | -2.1% |
| 14 | Volatility Regime (VIX-style) ✓ | Weekly | 14.4% | 0.79 | -34.1% | 57.1% | 35 | -4.5% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Domino's (DPZ)
137 of 631 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Domino's (DPZ) outright. Another 112 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 59 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vortex | 2 | none needed | 3.19× |
| Random Walk Index | 2 | none needed | 3.24× |
| Disparity Index | 2 | none needed | 3.11× |
| Pretty Good Oscillator | 2 | none needed | 3.11× |
| Cutler's RSI | 2 | none needed | 2.5× |
| Smoothed MA (Wilder) | 2 | none needed | 2.72× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Domino's (DPZ), Vortex (7) on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Domino's’s signal flips
We track Domino's daily. Its backtested best indicator, Vortex (7) (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.