The best indicator for Cintas (CTAS)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Cintas (CTAS) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Cintas (CTAS) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Fibonacci Pivots
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Cintas (CTAS) over ~42.8 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 2.1% CAGR.
Cintas (CTAS) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Cintas (CTAS) — trailing buy-and-hold by 7.4% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fibonacci Pivots ✓ | Daily | 15.7% | 0.87 | -40.5% | 47.4% | 1687 | -2.1% |
| 2 | Pivot Points (Standard) ✓ | Daily | 14.7% | 0.86 | -34.3% | 48.1% | 1572 | -3.0% |
| 3 | Camarilla Pivots ✓ | Daily | 15.3% | 0.83 | -40.2% | 47.9% | 2204 | -2.5% |
| 4 | SMC: Change of Character ✓ | Weekly | 14.7% | 0.72 | -48.1% | 61.1% | 18 | -3.0% |
| 5 | Supertrend (7,2) ✓ | Weekly | 12.5% | 0.7 | -68.2% | 56.8% | 44 | -5.2% |
| 6 | QQE ✓ | Weekly | 15.5% | 0.69 | -65.0% | 55.4% | 130 | -2.2% |
| 7 | Supertrend Fast (10,2) ✓ | Weekly | 12.0% | 0.67 | -69.7% | 55.6% | 45 | -5.7% |
| 8 | Supertrend (10,2) ✓ | Weekly | 12.0% | 0.67 | -69.7% | 55.6% | 45 | -5.7% |
| 9 | Markov Regime ✓ | Daily | 16.4% | 0.66 | -65.3% | 37.5% | 16 | -1.4% |
| 10 | VIDYA 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 13.4% | 0.65 | -72.0% | 38.2% | 34 | -4.3% |
| 11 | ROC (60) ✓ | Weekly | 12.6% | 0.64 | -77.0% | 43.8% | 48 | -5.1% |
| 12 | VIDYA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 14.9% | 0.63 | -72.7% | 36.1% | 36 | -2.9% |
| 13 | Volume Flow Indicator ✓ | Weekly | 12.1% | 0.67 | -57.6% | 50.0% | 14 | -5.6% |
| 14 | TRIX (21) ✓ | Weekly | 13.6% | 0.67 | -51.3% | 57.1% | 14 | -4.1% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Cintas (CTAS)
0 of 662 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Cintas (CTAS) outright. Another 436 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 190 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zero-Lag MACD | — | 3.17× | 3.74× |
| QQE | — | 1.24× | 2.88× |
| KAMA 200 Trend | — | 1.33× | 3.69× |
| KAMA 100 Trend | — | 1.39× | 3.77× |
| Disparity (50) | — | 1.39× | 3.78× |
| RSI (25) | — | 1.45× | 3.68× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Cintas (CTAS), Fibonacci Pivots on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Cintas’s signal flips
We track Cintas daily. Its backtested best indicator, Fibonacci Pivots (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.