The best indicator for Chubb Limited (CB)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Chubb Limited (CB) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Chubb Limited (CB) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
SMC: Liquidity Sweep
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Chubb Limited (CB) over ~33.5 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 2.2% CAGR.
Chubb Limited (CB) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Chubb Limited (CB) — trailing buy-and-hold by 5.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SMC: Liquidity Sweep ✓ | Daily | 11.1% | 0.58 | -51.9% | 72.6% | 124 | -2.2% |
| 2 | WaveTrend (8/6/4) ✓ | Daily | 11.0% | 0.57 | -49.4% | 76.1% | 138 | -2.3% |
| 3 | DEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.5% | 0.57 | -33.8% | 60.7% | 28 | -4.7% |
| 4 | FRAMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.9% | 0.57 | -45.0% | 62.9% | 124 | -4.2% |
| 5 | WMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.56 | -42.6% | 64.7% | 17 | -3.9% |
| 6 | KAMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 9.2% | 0.56 | -32.7% | 64.7% | 17 | -4.0% |
| 7 | EMA 10/40 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 9.4% | 0.56 | -32.7% | 57.9% | 19 | -3.8% |
| 8 | DeMarker ✓ | Daily | 9.5% | 0.55 | -49.0% | 76.3% | 114 | -3.8% |
| 9 | McGinley 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 13.0% | 0.55 | -64.2% | 35.3% | 17 | -0.3% |
| 10 | Order-Flow Reversion ✓ | Weekly | 8.2% | 0.55 | -34.7% | 87.5% | 24 | -4.9% |
| 11 | Bollinger Mean-Reversion ✓ | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.54 | -34.7% | 84.0% | 25 | -5.1% |
| 12 | Fibonacci Bands ✓ | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.54 | -34.7% | 84.0% | 25 | -5.1% |
| 13 | WMA 15/60 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.8% | 0.54 | -42.4% | 61.1% | 18 | -4.3% |
| 14 | TRIX (15) ✓ | Weekly | 9.0% | 0.54 | -38.9% | 62.5% | 16 | -4.2% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Chubb Limited (CB)
0 of 675 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Chubb Limited (CB) outright. Another 214 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 199 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRAMA 10/30 Cross | — | 1.68× | 3.93× |
| Momentum (50) | — | 1.77× | 4.37× |
| Demand Index | — | 1.8× | 2.87× |
| Pivot Points (Standard) | — | 1.99× | 3.49× |
| Camarilla Pivots | — | 2.02× | 3.83× |
| Fibonacci Pivots | — | 2.03× | 3.66× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Chubb Limited (CB), SMC: Liquidity Sweep on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Chubb Limited’s signal flips
We track Chubb Limited daily. Its backtested best indicator, SMC: Liquidity Sweep (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.