The best indicator for Bunge Global (BG)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Bunge Global (BG) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Bunge Global (BG) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Hull MA 15/60 Cross
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Bunge Global (BG) over ~25.3 years — beating buy-and-hold by 0.9% CAGR.
Bunge Global (BG) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Bunge Global (BG) — trailing buy-and-hold by 0.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hull MA 15/60 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 10.9% | 0.61 | -34.1% | 52.9% | 34 | 0.9% |
| 2 | Ehlers Reflex ✓ | Weekly | 10.6% | 0.59 | -44.5% | 61.4% | 44 | 0.5% |
| 3 | T3 15/60 Cross ✓ | Daily | 10.2% | 0.56 | -36.4% | 51.1% | 47 | 0.1% |
| 4 | Ease of Movement ✓ | Weekly | 10.2% | 0.55 | -28.3% | 53.7% | 54 | 0.1% |
| 5 | TRIX ✓ | Weekly | 8.7% | 0.52 | -38.8% | 54.8% | 31 | -1.4% |
| 6 | MACD ✓ | Weekly | 8.9% | 0.51 | -34.1% | 56.8% | 44 | -1.1% |
| 7 | TEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.4% | 0.51 | -40.5% | 55.6% | 27 | -1.7% |
| 8 | Know Sure Thing ✓ | Weekly | 8.5% | 0.51 | -42.8% | 54.8% | 31 | -1.6% |
| 9 | Percentage Price Osc. ✓ | Weekly | 8.9% | 0.51 | -35.6% | 58.5% | 41 | -1.2% |
| 10 | MACD-V ✓ | Weekly | 8.8% | 0.51 | -31.5% | 59.6% | 47 | -1.3% |
| 11 | DEMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.8% | 0.51 | -46.3% | 56.2% | 32 | -1.3% |
| 12 | PPO Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.9% | 0.51 | -35.6% | 58.5% | 41 | -1.2% |
| 13 | Vortex ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.5 | -34.6% | 57.9% | 57 | -0.8% |
| 14 | RSI (50) ✓ | Weekly | 9.0% | 0.5 | -45.3% | 59.3% | 27 | -1.1% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Bunge Global (BG)
28 of 612 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Bunge Global (BG) outright. Another 230 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 223 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| QQE | 1 | 1.02× | 2.42× |
| Chandelier Exit | 1 | 1.89× | 2.93× |
| Vortex | 1 | 1.99× | 3.47× |
| Ease of Movement | 1 | 2.37× | 3.11× |
| Ehlers Reflex | 1 | 2.4× | 4.67× |
| MACD | 1 | none needed | 3.74× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Bunge Global (BG), Hull MA 15/60 Cross on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Bunge Global’s signal flips
We track Bunge Global daily. Its backtested best indicator, Hull MA 15/60 Cross (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.