The best indicator for Arista Networks (ANET)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Arista Networks (ANET) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Arista Networks (ANET) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Holy Grail Confluence
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Arista Networks (ANET) over ~12.0 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 15.0% CAGR.
Arista Networks (ANET) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Arista Networks (ANET) — trailing buy-and-hold by 18.4% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holy Grail Confluence ✓ | Daily | 22.4% | 1.09 | -33.2% | 95.0% | 20 | -15.0% |
| 2 | QQE ✓ | Weekly | 36.3% | 0.98 | -50.8% | 54.3% | 35 | -0.8% |
| 3 | DeMarker ✓ | Daily | 20.9% | 0.92 | -29.2% | 78.3% | 46 | -16.5% |
| 4 | Markov Regime ✓ | Daily | 34.4% | 0.91 | -52.2% | 59.3% | 27 | -2.9% |
| 5 | Stochastic Momentum Index ✓ | Daily | 19.3% | 0.88 | -25.4% | 76.9% | 52 | -18.1% |
| 6 | Connors RSI ✓ | Daily | 20.1% | 0.88 | -42.4% | 71.4% | 133 | -17.3% |
| 7 | Three White Soldiers ✓ | Daily | 20.6% | 0.87 | -34.6% | 62.0% | 142 | -16.8% |
| 8 | CMO (21) ✓ | Weekly | 26.4% | 0.87 | -40.9% | 38.1% | 21 | -10.7% |
| 9 | Connors RSI-2 ✓ | Daily | 18.2% | 0.85 | -36.8% | 69.0% | 126 | -19.2% |
| 10 | Demand Index ✓ | Daily | 24.2% | 0.85 | -46.5% | 69.2% | 120 | -13.1% |
| 11 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 32.1% | 0.85 | -55.4% | 29.4% | 17 | -5.2% |
| 12 | MA Envelope ✓ | Weekly | 21.0% | 0.84 | -34.6% | 72.7% | 33 | -16.1% |
| 13 | Fisher Center-of-Gravity ✓ | Weekly | 19.0% | 0.84 | -38.6% | 61.0% | 59 | -18.1% |
| 14 | WaveTrend (8/6/4) ✓ | Daily | 22.2% | 0.83 | -40.5% | 80.0% | 45 | -15.2% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Arista Networks (ANET)
1 of 531 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Arista Networks (ANET) outright. Another 115 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 347 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| QQE | 1 | 1.42× | 2.94× |
| Volume Zone Oscillator | — | 1.63× | 3.06× |
| MA Envelope | — | 1.69× | 2.64× |
| Demand Index | — | 1.79× | 2.17× |
| On-Balance Volume | — | 2.0× | 2.54× |
| Zero-Lag LSMA | — | 2.25× | 2.92× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Arista Networks (ANET), Holy Grail Confluence on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Arista Networks’s signal flips
We track Arista Networks daily. Its backtested best indicator, Holy Grail Confluence (Daily), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.