The best indicator for Assurant (AIZ)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Assurant (AIZ) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Assurant (AIZ) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Chandelier Exit
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Assurant (AIZ) over ~22.8 years — beating buy-and-hold by 0.4% CAGR.
Assurant (AIZ) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Assurant (AIZ) — trailing buy-and-hold by 5.5% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chandelier Exit ✓ | Weekly | 13.3% | 0.72 | -29.5% | 47.2% | 36 | 0.4% |
| 2 | Williams Fractals ✓ | Weekly | 11.7% | 0.72 | -26.8% | 70.8% | 24 | -1.2% |
| 3 | TSI (13,7) ✓ | Weekly | 11.5% | 0.71 | -33.4% | 55.2% | 29 | -1.4% |
| 4 | Accelerator Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 10.8% | 0.69 | -42.9% | 66.7% | 69 | -2.1% |
| 5 | Smoothed Heikin-Ashi ✓ | Weekly | 11.2% | 0.69 | -27.2% | 44.1% | 68 | -1.7% |
| 6 | SMC: Fair Value Gap ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.69 | -31.7% | 48.8% | 43 | -1.5% |
| 7 | CCI Trend ✓ | Weekly | 10.8% | 0.67 | -31.0% | 49.0% | 49 | -2.0% |
| 8 | Supertrend (7,2) ✓ | Weekly | 11.0% | 0.67 | -29.0% | 64.0% | 25 | -1.9% |
| 9 | Trendlines with Breaks ✓ | Daily | 11.8% | 0.66 | -37.5% | 53.3% | 45 | -1.1% |
| 10 | Supertrend Fast (10,2) ✓ | Weekly | 11.1% | 0.66 | -31.2% | 66.7% | 24 | -1.8% |
| 11 | Supertrend (10,2) ✓ | Weekly | 11.1% | 0.66 | -31.2% | 66.7% | 24 | -1.8% |
| 12 | McGinley Dynamic ✓ | Weekly | 12.5% | 0.65 | -40.3% | 50.0% | 40 | -0.4% |
| 13 | ROC (30) ✓ | Weekly | 10.8% | 0.65 | -29.3% | 67.6% | 37 | -2.0% |
| 14 | CMO (30) ✓ | Weekly | 10.8% | 0.65 | -29.3% | 67.6% | 37 | -2.0% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Assurant (AIZ)
5 of 609 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Assurant (AIZ) outright. Another 267 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 176 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCI | 1 | none needed | 5.88× |
| Rate of Change | 1 | none needed | 2.99× |
| VWAP Trend | 1 | none needed | 3.7× |
| CCI Trend | 1 | none needed | 3.72× |
| Chande Kroll Stop | 1 | none needed | 2.51× |
| Sine-Weighted MA | — | 1.14× | 2.88× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Assurant (AIZ), Chandelier Exit on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Assurant’s signal flips
We track Assurant daily. Its backtested best indicator, Chandelier Exit (Weekly), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.