The best indicator for Ventas (VTR)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Ventas (VTR) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Ventas (VTR) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
TEMA 20/50 Cross
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Ventas (VTR) over ~29.2 years — beating buy-and-hold by 3.8% CAGR.
Ventas (VTR) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Ventas (VTR) — trailing buy-and-hold by 1.2% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 13.9% | 0.76 | -31.4% | 62.1% | 29 | 3.8% |
| 2 | Williams %R (50) ✓ | Weekly | 13.4% | 0.7 | -48.9% | 39.4% | 33 | 3.4% |
| 3 | T3 8/21 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 13.8% | 0.69 | -48.2% | 61.5% | 26 | 3.8% |
| 4 | Chandelier Exit ✓ | Weekly | 15.1% | 0.68 | -59.7% | 60.0% | 40 | 5.1% |
| 5 | EMA 9/26 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 12.6% | 0.66 | -44.1% | 44.4% | 18 | 2.6% |
| 6 | Volatility Regime (VIX-style) ✓ | Weekly | 9.4% | 0.65 | -45.0% | 51.5% | 33 | -0.6% |
| 7 | SMA 50/200 Cross ✓ | Daily | 12.4% | 0.64 | -45.2% | 55.6% | 18 | 2.8% |
| 8 | Ichimoku TK Cross ✓ | Weekly | 12.7% | 0.64 | -64.4% | 56.7% | 30 | 2.7% |
| 9 | Ease of Movement ✓ | Weekly | 13.0% | 0.64 | -66.1% | 54.7% | 64 | 2.9% |
| 10 | Ulcer Index | Weekly | 9.6% | 0.64 | -44.9% | 52.4% | 42 | -0.4% |
| 11 | Williams %R (28) ✓ | Weekly | 12.2% | 0.64 | -56.1% | 47.3% | 55 | 2.2% |
| 12 | CCI (50) ✓ | Weekly | 11.7% | 0.64 | -50.0% | 44.8% | 29 | 1.7% |
| 13 | TRIMA 30 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 11.1% | 0.64 | -43.4% | 55.3% | 38 | 1.1% |
| 14 | WMA 15/60 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 11.5% | 0.63 | -54.3% | 60.0% | 15 | 1.5% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Ventas (VTR)
168 of 682 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Ventas (VTR) outright. Another 243 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 126 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACD | 2 | none needed | 3.08× |
| TEMA 20/50 Cross | 2 | none needed | 4.24× |
| Aroon | 2 | none needed | 3.35× |
| Vortex | 2 | none needed | 2.71× |
| TRIX | 2 | none needed | 3.36× |
| Know Sure Thing | 2 | none needed | 3.46× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Ventas (VTR), TEMA 20/50 Cross on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Ventas’s signal flips
We track Ventas daily. Its backtested best indicator, TEMA 20/50 Cross (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.