The best indicator for Vertiv (VRT)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Vertiv (VRT) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Vertiv (VRT) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
VuManChu Cipher B
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Vertiv (VRT) over ~8.2 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 4.9% CAGR.
Vertiv (VRT) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Vertiv (VRT) — trailing buy-and-hold by 11.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VuManChu Cipher B ✓ | Weekly | 42.8% | 1.29 | -36.3% | 59.1% | 22 | -4.9% |
| 2 | Historical Volatility Regime ✓ | Daily | 37.0% | 1.26 | -20.0% | 52.8% | 53 | -11.6% |
| 3 | Donchian Midline ✓ | Weekly | 51.8% | 1.26 | -43.5% | 73.3% | 15 | 4.1% |
| 4 | ROC (5) ✓ | Weekly | 49.3% | 1.26 | -32.3% | 54.8% | 31 | 1.6% |
| 5 | WMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Daily | 49.2% | 1.25 | -37.3% | 42.1% | 19 | 0.6% |
| 6 | WMA 15/60 Cross ✓ | Daily | 48.9% | 1.24 | -43.1% | 50.0% | 20 | 0.4% |
| 7 | Exponential Hull MA ✓ | Weekly | 44.3% | 1.23 | -31.3% | 57.6% | 33 | -3.4% |
| 8 | Force Index ✓ | Weekly | 46.6% | 1.22 | -39.9% | 55.0% | 20 | -1.0% |
| 9 | Disparity Index ✓ | Weekly | 49.4% | 1.22 | -28.7% | 61.9% | 21 | 1.7% |
| 10 | Pretty Good Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 49.5% | 1.22 | -28.7% | 63.2% | 19 | 1.8% |
| 11 | SMA 10/40 Cross ✓ | Daily | 47.1% | 1.21 | -42.1% | 48.0% | 25 | -1.5% |
| 12 | Trendlines with Breaks ✓ | Daily | 48.9% | 1.2 | -34.6% | 62.5% | 16 | 0.3% |
| 13 | Guppy Multiple MA ✓ | Daily | 47.6% | 1.19 | -36.7% | 46.2% | 26 | -1.0% |
| 14 | WMA 200 Trend ✓ | Daily | 49.4% | 1.19 | -37.6% | 23.5% | 17 | 0.8% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Vertiv (VRT)
2 of 364 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Vertiv (VRT) outright. Another 169 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 170 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fisher Transform | 1 | none needed | 3.51× |
| Even Better Sinewave | 1 | none needed | 3.01× |
| QQE | — | 1.25× | 1.86× |
| Delta Volume Rising (CVD proxy) | — | 1.65× | 2.41× |
| FRAMA 100 Trend | — | 1.68× | 2.28× |
| Sine-Weighted MA | — | 1.8× | 2.22× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Vertiv (VRT), VuManChu Cipher B on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Vertiv’s signal flips
We track Vertiv daily. Its backtested best indicator, VuManChu Cipher B (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.