The best indicator for Textron (TXT)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Textron (TXT) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Textron (TXT) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Twiggs Money Flow
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Textron (TXT) over ~53.5 years — beating buy-and-hold by 1.4% CAGR.
Textron (TXT) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Textron (TXT) — trailing buy-and-hold by 0.9% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Twiggs Money Flow ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.51 | -47.0% | 46.5% | 170 | 1.4% |
| 2 | SMC: Order Block ✓ | Weekly | 8.8% | 0.51 | -51.9% | 43.3% | 60 | 0.9% |
| 3 | Accumulation/Distribution ✓ | Weekly | 8.9% | 0.5 | -53.0% | 45.1% | 182 | 1.1% |
| 4 | WMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.5% | 0.49 | -56.9% | 56.9% | 58 | 0.6% |
| 5 | McGinley 100 Trend ✓ | Daily | 10.3% | 0.48 | -70.1% | 31.1% | 103 | 2.4% |
| 6 | Cutler's RSI ✓ | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.48 | -49.7% | 51.0% | 151 | 0.3% |
| 7 | ROC (14) ✓ | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.48 | -49.7% | 51.0% | 151 | 0.3% |
| 8 | CMO (14) ✓ | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.48 | -49.7% | 51.0% | 151 | 0.3% |
| 9 | Donchian 10 Break ✓ | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.48 | -44.4% | 56.0% | 50 | 0.3% |
| 10 | SMC: Fair Value Gap ✓ | Weekly | 9.3% | 0.48 | -44.4% | 49.6% | 115 | 1.4% |
| 11 | Coppock Curve ✓ | Weekly | 8.1% | 0.47 | -58.0% | 56.9% | 58 | 0.3% |
| 12 | McGinley Dynamic ✓ | Weekly | 10.2% | 0.47 | -68.9% | 41.0% | 83 | 2.3% |
| 13 | DEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 7.7% | 0.46 | -55.8% | 63.4% | 41 | -0.1% |
| 14 | Aroon ✓ | Weekly | 7.6% | 0.46 | -55.2% | 58.1% | 93 | -0.2% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Textron (TXT)
6 of 716 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Textron (TXT) outright. Another 138 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 325 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demand Index | 1 | 1.62× | 1.74× |
| Intraday Momentum Index | 1 | 1.63× | 2.21× |
| CCI | 1 | 2.15× | 3.34× |
| QQE | 1 | none needed | 1.51× |
| Median MA | 1 | none needed | 3.2× |
| SMC: Liquidity Sweep | 1 | none needed | 2.08× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Textron (TXT), Twiggs Money Flow on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Textron’s signal flips
We track Textron daily. Its backtested best indicator, Twiggs Money Flow (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.