The best indicator for TE Connectivity (TEL)
We backtested 366 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real TE Connectivity (TEL) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Stochastic (20,5)
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for TE Connectivity (TEL) over ~18.9 years — beating buy-and-hold by 2.5% CAGR.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for TE Connectivity (TEL) — trailing buy-and-hold by 7.4% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stochastic (20,5) ✓ | Daily | 14.1% | 0.7 | -54.5% | 45.6% | 331 | 2.5% |
| 2 | Elder-Ray ✓ | Weekly | 6.8% | 0.7 | -16.5% | 45.7% | 81 | -4.7% |
| 3 | Stochastic Slow (21,5) ✓ | Daily | 13.8% | 0.69 | -61.9% | 46.7% | 332 | 2.3% |
| 4 | McGinley Dynamic ✓ | Weekly | 14.7% | 0.68 | -41.2% | 35.1% | 37 | 3.2% |
| 5 | Markov Regime ✓ | Weekly | 14.9% | 0.68 | -45.3% | 73.7% | 19 | 3.4% |
| 6 | Chande Kroll Stop ✓ | Weekly | 14.5% | 0.65 | -45.5% | 37.5% | 48 | 3.0% |
| 7 | Schaff Trend Cycle ✓ | Daily | 4.6% | 0.64 | -11.2% | 61.2% | 152 | -7.0% |
| 8 | ROC (30) ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.64 | -27.9% | 43.8% | 32 | -0.1% |
| 9 | CMO (30) ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.64 | -27.9% | 43.8% | 32 | -0.1% |
| 10 | Momentum (30) ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.64 | -27.9% | 43.8% | 32 | -0.1% |
| 11 | DEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 10.9% | 0.66 | -29.1% | 57.1% | 14 | -0.6% |
| 12 | ALMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 10.0% | 0.61 | -27.0% | 57.1% | 21 | -1.5% |
| 13 | SMC: Change of Character ✓ | Daily | 10.7% | 0.61 | -38.3% | 45.5% | 55 | -0.8% |
| 14 | QQE ✓ | Weekly | 13.9% | 0.6 | -59.1% | 54.9% | 51 | 2.4% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
For TE Connectivity (TEL), Stochastic (20,5) on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get the weekly edge report
The best-performing indicator per asset, what changed this week, and the honest caveats — straight to your inbox.