The best indicator for TE Connectivity (TEL)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real TE Connectivity (TEL) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where TE Connectivity (TEL) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Stochastic (20,5)
On the daily chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for TE Connectivity (TEL) over ~18.9 years — beating buy-and-hold by 2.5% CAGR.
TE Connectivity (TEL) on the daily chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for TE Connectivity (TEL) — trailing buy-and-hold by 7.4% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stochastic (20,5) ✓ | Daily | 14.1% | 0.7 | -54.5% | 45.6% | 331 | 2.5% |
| 2 | Elder-Ray ✓ | Weekly | 6.8% | 0.7 | -16.5% | 45.7% | 81 | -4.7% |
| 3 | Stochastic Slow (21,5) ✓ | Daily | 13.8% | 0.69 | -61.9% | 46.7% | 332 | 2.3% |
| 4 | McGinley Dynamic ✓ | Weekly | 14.7% | 0.68 | -41.2% | 35.1% | 37 | 3.2% |
| 5 | Markov Regime ✓ | Weekly | 14.9% | 0.68 | -45.3% | 73.7% | 19 | 3.4% |
| 6 | Chande Kroll Stop ✓ | Weekly | 14.5% | 0.65 | -45.5% | 37.5% | 48 | 3.0% |
| 7 | Schaff Trend Cycle ✓ | Daily | 4.6% | 0.64 | -11.2% | 61.2% | 152 | -7.0% |
| 8 | ROC (30) ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.64 | -27.9% | 43.8% | 32 | -0.1% |
| 9 | CMO (30) ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.64 | -27.9% | 43.8% | 32 | -0.1% |
| 10 | Momentum (30) ✓ | Weekly | 11.4% | 0.64 | -27.9% | 43.8% | 32 | -0.1% |
| 11 | Volatility Stop (ATR) ✓ | Weekly | 12.2% | 0.64 | -47.8% | 43.5% | 23 | 0.7% |
| 12 | DEMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 10.9% | 0.66 | -29.1% | 57.1% | 14 | -0.6% |
| 13 | ALMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 10.0% | 0.61 | -27.0% | 57.1% | 21 | -1.5% |
| 14 | SMC: Change of Character ✓ | Daily | 10.7% | 0.61 | -38.3% | 45.5% | 55 | -0.8% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on TE Connectivity (TEL)
9 of 621 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on TE Connectivity (TEL) outright. Another 170 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 248 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| QQE | 1 | 1.11× | 3.36× |
| Net Volume | 1 | 1.51× | 3.49× |
| Liquidity Flow Oscillator | 1 | 1.51× | 3.49× |
| Stochastic | 1 | none needed | 3.95× |
| WaveTrend (8/6/4) | 1 | none needed | 4.33× |
| Stochastic Momentum Index | 1 | none needed | 5.56× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For TE Connectivity (TEL), Stochastic (20,5) on the daily timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when TE Connectivity’s signal flips
We track TE Connectivity daily. Its backtested best indicator, Stochastic (20,5) (Daily), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.