The best indicator for Snap
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Snap history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted over the full backtest, with costs, and checked out-of-sample.
Where Snap stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Stochastic RSI
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Snap over ~9.6 years — beating buy-and-hold by 28.4% CAGR.
Snap on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stochastic RSI ✓ | Weekly | 12.9% | 0.61 | -36.5% | 62.5% | 16 | 28.4% |
| 2 | Accumulation/Distribution | Weekly | 18.4% | 0.59 | -67.3% | 35.0% | 20 | 33.8% |
| 3 | Negative Volume Index | Daily | 13.8% | 0.57 | -58.5% | 55.6% | 18 | 28.5% |
| 4 | HMA 9/21 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 17.6% | 0.57 | -75.4% | 37.0% | 27 | 33.0% |
| 5 | Relative Vigor Index ✓ | Weekly | 17.7% | 0.56 | -76.5% | 43.2% | 37 | 33.2% |
| 6 | Delta Volume (CVD proxy) | Weekly | 16.9% | 0.56 | -66.9% | 36.8% | 19 | 32.4% |
| 7 | Momentum ✓ | Weekly | 16.0% | 0.54 | -57.8% | 36.7% | 30 | 31.4% |
| 8 | ROC (10) ✓ | Weekly | 16.0% | 0.54 | -57.8% | 36.7% | 30 | 31.4% |
| 9 | Momentum (10) ✓ | Weekly | 16.0% | 0.54 | -57.8% | 36.7% | 30 | 31.4% |
| 10 | Ehlers Relative Vigor ✓ | Weekly | 14.8% | 0.51 | -82.4% | 34.2% | 38 | 30.2% |
| 11 | Parabolic SAR (fast) | Weekly | 14.0% | 0.51 | -61.4% | 53.1% | 32 | 29.4% |
| 12 | VuManChu Cipher B ✓ | Weekly | 11.7% | 0.5 | -45.8% | 76.5% | 17 | 27.1% |
| 13 | Chaikin Oscillator | Weekly | 12.5% | 0.48 | -67.0% | 40.9% | 22 | 27.9% |
| 14 | Volume Zone Oscillator | Weekly | 12.4% | 0.48 | -65.4% | 42.1% | 38 | 27.9% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
The question doesn't apply here. Buy-and-hold on Snap lost money across the out-of-sample window in 428 of 428 tests, so there is no positive benchmark to lever toward — clearing a negative bar is a much weaker claim than beating a real one, and we keep the two apart rather than counting it as a win. How we compute that
For Snap, Stochastic RSI on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Snap’s signal flips
We track Snap daily. Its backtested best indicator, Stochastic RSI (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.