The best indicator for Regency Centers (REG)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Regency Centers (REG) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Regency Centers (REG) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
TRIX (15)
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Regency Centers (REG) over ~32.7 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 0.2% CAGR.
Regency Centers (REG) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Regency Centers (REG) — trailing buy-and-hold by 5.1% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TRIX (15) ✓ | Weekly | 9.7% | 0.63 | -38.3% | 60.0% | 15 | -0.2% |
| 2 | Negative Volume Index | Daily | 8.6% | 0.59 | -49.4% | 38.7% | 62 | -1.3% |
| 3 | WMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.9% | 0.59 | -43.7% | 57.9% | 19 | -1.0% |
| 4 | WMA 15/60 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.7% | 0.58 | -44.7% | 47.4% | 19 | -1.2% |
| 5 | SMA 20/50 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.8% | 0.57 | -41.1% | 68.8% | 16 | -1.1% |
| 6 | SMA 15/60 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 8.8% | 0.57 | -40.1% | 66.7% | 15 | -1.2% |
| 7 | QQE ✓ | Weekly | 11.8% | 0.55 | -50.6% | 52.6% | 97 | 1.9% |
| 8 | WMA 20/80 Cross | Weekly | 8.8% | 0.58 | -42.2% | 64.3% | 14 | -1.2% |
| 9 | SMA 50/200 Cross ✓ | Daily | 8.1% | 0.54 | -46.9% | 52.0% | 25 | -1.9% |
| 10 | Stochastic RSI ✓ | Weekly | 8.0% | 0.54 | -26.1% | 81.1% | 53 | -1.9% |
| 11 | Projection Bands ✓ | Weekly | 9.4% | 0.53 | -55.2% | 77.6% | 58 | -0.5% |
| 12 | T3 10/40 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 7.6% | 0.53 | -35.9% | 66.7% | 15 | -2.4% |
| 13 | SMC: Break of Structure ✓ | Weekly | 7.6% | 0.53 | -35.5% | 70.6% | 17 | -2.3% |
| 14 | Detrended Price Osc. ✓ | Weekly | 9.8% | 0.52 | -31.5% | 54.5% | 220 | -0.1% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Regency Centers (REG)
38 of 697 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Regency Centers (REG) outright. Another 70 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 66 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zero-Lag MACD | 2 | 2.06× | 2.92× |
| Bollinger Mean-Reversion | 2 | none needed | 2.1× |
| Detrended Price Osc. | 2 | none needed | 3.34× |
| Connors RSI | 2 | none needed | 2.2× |
| VWAP Bands | 2 | none needed | 2.02× |
| Projection Bands | 2 | none needed | 3.59× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Regency Centers (REG), TRIX (15) on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Regency Centers’s signal flips
We track Regency Centers daily. Its backtested best indicator, TRIX (15) (Weekly), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.