The best indicator for Mitsubishi UFJ
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Mitsubishi UFJ history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Mitsubishi UFJ stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Random Walk Index
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Mitsubishi UFJ over ~25.3 years — beating buy-and-hold by 4.2% CAGR.
Mitsubishi UFJ on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Random Walk Index ✓ | Weekly | 7.5% | 0.43 | -45.0% | 40.0% | 65 | 4.2% |
| 2 | Random Walk Index ✓ | Weekly | 7.5% | 0.43 | -45.0% | 40.0% | 65 | 4.2% |
| 3 | Hammer ✓ | Weekly | 5.2% | 0.42 | -25.7% | 59.4% | 32 | 1.9% |
| 4 | G-Channel ✓ | Weekly | 6.4% | 0.4 | -61.5% | 43.8% | 32 | 3.2% |
| 5 | TEMA 200 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 5.2% | 0.4 | -26.2% | 55.6% | 18 | 1.9% |
| 6 | KAMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 6.2% | 0.4 | -39.2% | 58.3% | 24 | 2.9% |
| 7 | Connors RSI-2 ✓ | Daily | 6.0% | 0.39 | -59.8% | 62.3% | 302 | 2.4% |
| 8 | EMA 8/21 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 6.5% | 0.39 | -65.9% | 40.9% | 22 | 3.2% |
| 9 | Center of Gravity ✓ | Weekly | 6.7% | 0.39 | -56.9% | 44.8% | 165 | 3.4% |
| 10 | Fisher Center-of-Gravity ✓ | Weekly | 5.5% | 0.39 | -35.0% | 48.2% | 137 | 2.2% |
| 11 | DeMarker (21) ✓ | Weekly | 6.5% | 0.39 | -65.7% | 54.2% | 48 | 3.2% |
| 12 | CMO (21) ✓ | Weekly | 6.5% | 0.38 | -58.2% | 42.9% | 56 | 3.2% |
| 13 | WMA 100 Trend ✓ | Weekly | 5.9% | 0.38 | -45.6% | 47.8% | 23 | 2.6% |
| 14 | Awesome Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 6.0% | 0.37 | -66.8% | 34.8% | 23 | 2.7% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Mitsubishi UFJ
6 of 625 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Mitsubishi UFJ outright. Another 429 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 138 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predictive Ranges | 2 | none needed | 3.96× |
| QQE | 1 | 1.23× | 2.83× |
| FRAMA 10/30 Cross | 1 | 2.09× | 3.88× |
| McGinley Dynamic | 1 | 2.3× | 3.66× |
| McGinley 100 Trend | 1 | none needed | 3.76× |
| SMA 5/20 Cross | — | 1.2× | 4.72× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Mitsubishi UFJ, Random Walk Index on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It beat buy-and-hold — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Mitsubishi UFJ’s signal flips
We track Mitsubishi UFJ daily. Its backtested best indicator, Random Walk Index (Weekly), is long right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.