The best indicator for Mettler Toledo (MTD)
We backtested 382 indicators across daily, weekly and hourly charts on real Mettler Toledo (MTD) history. Here's what actually worked — risk-adjusted, out-of-sample, with costs.
Where Mettler Toledo (MTD) stands
Computed from our own daily OHLCV history, not quoted from a third party. Moving averages use closing prices; "52-week" is the last 252 trading sessions.
Volume Zone Oscillator
On the weekly chart, this is the strongest risk-adjusted edge we found for Mettler Toledo (MTD) over ~28.7 years — trailing buy-and-hold by 3.8% CAGR.
Mettler Toledo (MTD) on the weekly chart
The timeframe our backtest found best for this asset. The chart is live market data; the results above are hypothetical and historical.
Chart by TradingView. Loading it contacts tradingview.com, which may set its own cookies — see our privacy policy.
Best multi-indicator combo
Going long only when all 2 agree was the strongest confluence setup we found for Mettler Toledo (MTD) — trailing buy-and-hold by 11.9% CAGR, out-of-sample. Fewer, higher-conviction trades than any single indicator.
The winner on each chart
Every indicator, ranked
Ranked by Sharpe (risk-adjusted return). Hypothetical, fees included.
| # | Indicator | TF | CAGR | Sharpe | Max DD | Win | Trades | vs B&H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volume Zone Oscillator ✓ | Weekly | 12.6% | 0.67 | -35.8% | 51.5% | 134 | -3.8% |
| 2 | SMC: Liquidity Sweep ✓ | Weekly | 12.2% | 0.66 | -42.8% | 91.3% | 23 | -4.2% |
| 3 | Ichimoku TK Cross ✓ | Daily | 12.2% | 0.65 | -38.0% | 48.2% | 170 | -4.3% |
| 4 | Ehlers Stochastic ✓ | Daily | 11.9% | 0.63 | -37.8% | 50.6% | 166 | -4.6% |
| 5 | Volume Flow Indicator ✓ | Daily | 12.5% | 0.61 | -38.6% | 43.2% | 44 | -4.0% |
| 6 | Coppock Curve ✓ | Daily | 11.4% | 0.6 | -49.1% | 50.0% | 166 | -5.1% |
| 7 | On-Balance Volume ✓ | Weekly | 11.0% | 0.6 | -32.7% | 53.4% | 103 | -5.4% |
| 8 | QQE ✓ | Weekly | 13.8% | 0.6 | -62.4% | 50.0% | 90 | -2.5% |
| 9 | MA Envelope ✓ | Daily | 10.1% | 0.59 | -36.5% | 73.2% | 190 | -6.4% |
| 10 | McGinley 100 Trend | Daily | 13.5% | 0.59 | -61.3% | 38.7% | 62 | -3.0% |
| 11 | SMA 10/30 Cross ✓ | Weekly | 11.6% | 0.59 | -39.9% | 60.0% | 25 | -4.8% |
| 12 | Ehlers TrendFlex ✓ | Daily | 10.8% | 0.58 | -45.3% | 48.6% | 148 | -5.7% |
| 13 | Even Better Sinewave ✓ | Daily | 10.8% | 0.58 | -45.7% | 47.3% | 150 | -5.7% |
| 14 | McGinley 10/30 Cross ✓ | Daily | 11.7% | 0.58 | -44.2% | 51.0% | 49 | -4.8% |
✓ = held up out-of-sample. Hypothetical, costs included. See methodology.
What it would take to beat buy & hold on Mettler Toledo (MTD)
28 of 678 tested setups beat buy-and-hold on Mettler Toledo (MTD) outright. Another 162 could get there with leverage they would survive — but 204 would be liquidated by their own drawdown before they caught it.
| Indicator | Beats B&H unlevered | Leverage needed | Leverage survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Know Sure Thing | 1 | 1.1× | 2.94× |
| QQE | 1 | 1.23× | 2.05× |
| Pring's Special K | 1 | 1.8× | 3.8× |
| Projection Bands | 1 | 2.47× | 2.67× |
| EMA 8/21 Cross | 1 | 2.64× | 3.28× |
| Volatility Regime (VIX-style) | 1 | 2.74× | 3.27× |
Out-of-sample, costs included. A setup is only listed if the leverage it needs is less than the leverage its own worst drawdown survives — when it isn't, no amount of leverage gets there. Volatility drag isn't modelled, so these are the optimistic case. Every indicator, ranked this way
For Mettler Toledo (MTD), Volume Zone Oscillator on the weekly timeframe gave the best balance of return and risk in our test. It still trailed buy-and-hold on raw return — but remember: this is a hypothetical backtest of a standard rule, not a recommendation. Markets change. See the methodology and disclaimer.
More stock
Get alerted when Mettler Toledo’s signal flips
We track Mettler Toledo daily. Its backtested best indicator, Volume Zone Oscillator (Weekly), is flat right now — we'll email you the moment that changes. Free, no spam, unsubscribe any time.